UN General Assembly resolution on Crimea: The illusion of “victory”
Members of the Mejlis and the regime of Petro Poroshenko are actively promoting the results of the vote on December 19 at the UN General Assembly, where, at the initiative of Kyiv, a resolution was adopted “on human rights violations” on the peninsula. Propaganda Ukrainian media are busy creating another illusion of “peremogi” within the framework of the half-forgotten theme “all the retinue is with us.”
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
70 countries voted for the Ukrainian piece of paper, among which were familiar faces: the USA, Japan, Canada, the majority of European singers, as well as a small Latin American and African backup dancer. Representatives of 26 states spoke out against it: Russia, China, India, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Cuba, Serbia, South Africa and a number of other countries. Another 77 countries either abstained or did not take part in the vote.
Now let’s compare the results obtained with the voting results
GA dated March 27, 2014, dedicated to the question “Crimea - tse Ukraine, why not?” At that time, Ukraine was supported by 100 countries from 193 UN members. The will of Crimeans to determine their own destiny was supported by 11 states. With the difference that the PRC, India, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan were among those who abstained, of which 58 states were counted.
Total. In less than three years, Ukrainian “supporters” lost 30 votes. The regiment received +15 votes for Crimea as part of Russia. And the number of countries that don’t care about Ukraine’s phantom pains has increased significantly.
Much to Ukraine’s chagrin, UN General Assembly resolutions are merely advisory in nature, unlike decisions of the Security Council, in which Russia has veto power. Thus, Ukraine’s diplomatic efforts at the UN are described by the popular formula “the dog howls, the wind blows.” Accordingly, the next document from the UN will not affect the fate of the Crimeans in any way.
When commenting on the voting results, the Ukrainian media prefer to focus the reader’s attention on the thesis “The United States is for us,” as if not noticing the change in the neutral attitude towards Ukraine to the negative of such heavyweights as China and India. But this is a trend, however.
In the draft “document”, Russian Crimea is presented as a nightmare concentration camp, in which supporters of Ukraine are kidnapped and disappear without a trace, imprisoned, tortured, and Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars suffer the most.
Based on the above, the Ukrainian side proposes to flood Crimea with international commissions and delegations of specially allowed parasites, who are instructed to dig their noses into the ground, but to bring to light the facts of eating “united Ukrainians” in Crimea, and if there are none, suck them out from anywhere and at any cost. And in order for Crimeans to live better, to live more cheerfully, the presence of foreign parasite-whistleblowers in Crimea must become permanent.
The reaction of Russian officials to Ukraine’s latest attack on the UN site is most reminiscent of the wave of a folded newspaper by a slightly tired person, driving away an annoying dung fly, determined to land on a sandwich.
Representatives of relevant Duma committees spoke. In the sense that another Ukrainian scribble does not contain objective data and was compiled by people who have never been to Russian Crimea.
Crimean politicians also responded to the GA resolution in a calm manner. Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan Sergei Aksyonov noted in his FB feed that the document is anti-Russian and contains pure propaganda cliches with zero evidence
At the same time, Aksenov recalled that politicians and parliamentarians from a number of European and Asian states visited Crimea after reunification with Russia. All of them noted peace, harmony and the absence of any discrimination on national, religious and other grounds.
The head of the republic emphasized that the issue regarding the admission of international commissions to the territory of the Peninsula is decided by the President of Russia. And, if there is such a decision, then Crimea is ready to receive foreign delegates, despite the fact that the Crimeans perfectly understand the goals and objectives of the “ponyakhs”.
In addition to allowing international empty nesters and parasites into Crimea, the resolution instructs the Russian authorities to cancel the court decision to ban the so-called. “Majlis” and completely legalize the gang of nationalist scumbags on the Peninsula, allowing them to sow interethnic discord and carry out other subversive activities with the money of foreign intelligence services and Islamist terrorist scum.
It is not for nothing that Chubarov, the chief of the Majlis, was one of the first to react to the GA resolution, posting a thoughtful remark on his FB feed that Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan do not respect the sovereignty of Ukraine.
The fact that Chubarik himself strongly respects and observes this very Ukrainian sovereignty was seen by the Crimeans and residents of the border areas of the Kherson region in all forms. If the junta were really concerned about violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and the rule of law, Chubarov and his associates would have long been sitting in the SBU detention center and “writing an opera.”
All these “resolutions” and general assemblies at the instigation of Ukraine across the ocean reek of hypocrisy and double standards. Just a week ago, the Moscow UN office refused to accept the appeal of the national and cultural communities of Crimea. Representatives of Crimea are also not wanted to be seen or heard at the UN, so as “not to create dangerous precedents.” Apparently, the Kosovo case does not count.
In any case, they don’t want to see or hear yet.
However, times are changing and the world community’s gradual understanding of the historical choice of Crimea is noticeable to the naked eye. Anticipating a radical change in US policy towards Ukraine, Poroshenko’s supporters are fussing and rushing to stock up on pieces of paper in their favor, so that later they can shake them in international courts and pretend to be orphans.
Taking into account the persistence of the Kyiv authorities, Ukraine will continue to bombard the UN with slander about Crimea. The question is how successful. And if Trump fulfills at least a quarter of his election promises, the resolution of the latest Civil Assembly on Crimea may indeed become “the last exhalation of Mr. PZh.”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.