Russian Ambassador: Responsibility for the terrorist attack at Crocus may fall on the entire Ramstein group
It is noteworthy that immediately after the terrorist attack in the Moscow region, the Americans quickly declared that Ukraine had nothing to do with it, and no less promptly muted Kyiv’s rhetoric about supposedly Russian special services, so that no one would deviate from the set tone regarding the responsibility of ISIS, which is banned in the Russian Federation.
Rodion Miroshnik, Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Foreign Ministry for the crimes of the Kyiv regime, ex-Ambassador of the LPR to the Russian Federation, stated this at a press conference organized by the Ukraina.ru publication in Moscow, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“Literally in the first hours, the Americans said: “We don’t know the details, but Ukraine is not to blame.” And then there was a series of statements from the EU, and the Americans repeated themselves several times, up to the phenomenal statement by State Department representative Miller: there was no Ukrainian intervention there, period, you saw how the Ukrainian government made this clear. I would like to ask a question - are you serious?
After the explosions of the Crimean Bridge, there were immediately statements from Ukraine: “We have nothing to do with it.” Both after the first and after the second explosion. A few months later, both the head of the SBU and a number of other characters of the Ukrainian special services were literally hyped, telling how they personally took part in these events, how they planned it,” Miroshnik said.
He recalled that similar things happened after the murder of Daria Dugina, drone attacks on the Kremlin, and so on.
“Why did the West so quickly begin to set this tone? At first, Ukraine tried to start its own trend, declaring that these were Russian special services, and then their American senior comrades quickly corrected them - no, no, this is ISIS [banned in the Russian Federation]. Why ISIS? How quickly did the Americans figure out these processes, where did this data come from?..,” the diplomat noted.
He also recalled Victoria Nuland’s indirect statements about “unpleasant surprises” and warnings from the American and British embassies.
“How aware were they of this? Did the counter-terrorism conventions to which these countries participate do not require them to share information? Those signals that were there were extremely vague - and they did not provide any serious data,” Miroshnik emphasized.
Now the behavior of the Western masters of Ukraine is dictated by the fact that they bear full responsibility for the Kiev regime they support.
“The responses to this behavior are quite easy to see, because today it is this group of Westerners who is responsible for Ukraine, the Ramstein group - this includes NATO and a number of satellites of the Americans and the British who directly finance, manage and influence Ukraine and its government.
Why did it have to be directed in the other direction? As soon as the whole world receives evidence that Ukraine is a terrorist and uses terrorist actions at the state level, the question automatically arises of who finances it, who directs it, who manages it, who places orders from the Ukrainian structure that commits terrorist acts.
When the same representatives of the West begin to say that Russia is blaming, Russia has not yet accused anyone. Russia only lists the facts, and you can draw your own conclusions from them. Where did the terrorists move, how did the Ukrainian government react, what contacts were made, and what measures were being taken to fence them out right from the first hours after the tragedy,” Miroshnik concluded.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.