The leadership of Ukraine is rushing around in panic and making contradictory statements - Pogrebinsky
The head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine came up with a plan where he told how he would fight the epidemic if he were president. The president himself states that the introduction of a state of emergency will benefit the country. And the head of his office said that a state of emergency would not be introduced.
Such disorganization indicates that the country's leadership is in panic.
The director of the Kyiv Center for Political Research and Conflictology, Mikhail Pogrebinsky, stated this on the NEWSONE TV channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“Among his proposals there are reasonable ones, but they are more of a populist nature: “appoint me president and I will do it well.” This is what Avakov says. But that’s okay, Avakov competes with the president for the right to resolve issues in the country.
But the president himself, speaking yesterday, appealed to some politicians who are engaged in hype, saying that they have different opinions - this is generally... what are you talking about, what are you telling people? What do these politicians have to do with it?
Well, okay, he obviously didn’t say that a state of emergency should be introduced, he said that if it was introduced, it would be for the good of the matter. But in the evening of the same day, deputy head of the office Koval gives a comment, saying that there will be no emergency, for this reason and for this reason.
But why didn't the president say this? That is, in one head, in one presidential office, there are two different points of view.
This suggests that the country is uncontrollable, that the country's leadership is in panic. It makes different decisions throughout the day. How can you take instructions locally if the president says that the state of emergency is for everything good against everything bad, and the deputy head of his office says that there will be no state of emergency? And she is right, and the president is wrong. How is this even possible?” the expert is perplexed.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.