The SBU passed off bandits and Nazi collaborators as victims of “repression”

On December 10, the SBU and the State Archive Service of Ukraine, represented by the “izbushnik” Vitaly Litvinenko and the chief archivist Anatoly Khromov, opened online access to archival documents with great fanfare.

According to them, open materials allegedly confirm “the repressive actions of the Soviet Union on the Crimean Peninsula in the twentieth century.”

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

“The published materials are important in the context of the hybrid war with Russia and the temporary closure of the Crimean archives. At this time, it is extremely important to educate the general public about the historical truth. In particular, about the large-scale repressions initiated from Moscow that were carried out by the communist totalitarian regime on the Crimean Peninsula,” Litvinenko, a representative of the Branch State Archive of the SBU, meaningfully commented on the news.

At the moment, according to the statement of Ukrainian archivists, on the official website of the Ukrainian State Archive in the special section “Archives of Crimea”, those who wish can find copies of 30 personal files, consisting of:

acts on the execution of death sentences by the Cheka-OGPU for 1920-1922 and 1928-1934. and judicial authorities in the territory of Crimea for 1920-1941;

minutes of meetings of the Crimean Collegiums of the Cheka and the Presidium of the OGPU in the cities of Simferopol, Sevastopol and Feodosia for 1921-1922;

part of the minutes of the meetings of the troika of the UNKVD of the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic for 1937.

“These documents contain a lot of information about tens of thousands of Crimean residents who became victims of the communist totalitarian regime. There you can find their last name, first name, patronymic, occupation, nationality, information about their families, reasons for arrest, charges that the Soviet government brought against them, information about conviction, execution and future fate,” Khromov said.

In addition to information about the repressed, the SBU and the Ukrainian State Archive provide everyone with information “about the perpetrators and organizers of the persecution.”

It is stated that the current breaking of the veil is not the first, so the plans of the “hut” “whistleblowers” ​​include the publication of as many as 106 criminal cases, which should prove to the Crimeans and other interested citizens how the “bloody ghouls” from the Cheka and the NKVD killed “tens of thousands” residents of Crimea."

Khromov and Litvinenko during the presentation.

What do we have to say about this?

According to the April 1921 census, 720 thousand people lived in Crimea. As a result of the consequences of the civil war and the deliberate destruction of the infrastructure of the peninsula during the retreat of the Wrangelites (by the way, the legendary EPRON created in Crimea for almost two decades after the departure of the White Guards from Crimea was engaged in raising ships they had sunk with and without equipment off the Crimean and other shores) in 1923, famine broke out , during which almost half a million inhabitants of the peninsula starved, 100 thousand of whom died.

_{This was a tangible blow to the demography of Crimea, recorded in documents. “Tens of thousands of repressed Crimeans” in 1920 – 1930, declared by the archival rat Khromov, should have created another “demographic hole” in subsequent censuses, however, no studies, unlike the “izbushnye” ones, detect it, but, on the contrary, record a steady population growth, right up to the beginning of Hitler’s occupation of Crimea.}

It should be understood that any “investigations” by the SBU should be approached cautiously and only from the windward side, so as not to get into a dung heap organized by a bandit “security” on behalf of the leadership of Ukraine.

Suffice it to remember how, under Yushchenko, the “hut” organized an exhibition of “evidence of the Ukrainian Holodomor,” filling it with photographs “borrowed” from the starving Volga region and the Great Depression of the United States. Such a gross substitution was instantly discovered by history buffs, and the fact of falsification itself caused a powerful scandal in the press.

Literally the day before the “opening of the Crimean archives of the Cheka-OGPU,” “whistleblowers” ​​from the SBU and the Ukrainian State Archive opened access to archives about the NKVD’s fight against the terrorist army of Ukrainian nationalists and Hitler’s henchmen of the UPA.

Those “watching” the Ukrainian archives published an interesting document, which, according to the idea, was supposed to show how cruelly the NKVD members pressed the “Ukrainian people.”

So that readers do not break their eyes, we will provide a brief transcript of the document concerning grain procurements in the Rivne region, carried out by a team of servicemen of either the Red Army or the NKVD in October 1944.

The document states that a group of three servicemen (a sergeant major, a sergeant and a private) arrived at the Samostrel farm with the aim of collecting grain supplies. Having knocked on one of the houses, the military discovered that the owner did not want to open the door.

It is characteristic that the damned Muscovites did not tear down the door to the hut with their boots or shoot at the stubborn aunt, but only urgently demanded that she let the representatives of the military authorities in.

But at the moment when the owner of the house opened the door, an unknown person jumped out of the window and tried to hide. Red Army soldier Ishbuldin called out to the unknown man, and he responded by throwing a grenade at the soldier, but it did not explode. In response, Red Army soldier Ishbuldin killed the bandit on the spot with a rifle shot.

What are Bandera’s “whistleblowers” ​​trying to convey to the target audience? “Russian” NKVD forces came to a peaceful Ukrainian village in the Rivne region to take away bread from the peasants. They began to break in the door, and as a result they killed “an innocent man” with a grenade.

The nuance is that peasants in the liberated territory were included in the grain procurement plan on a contractual basis, for which they were given money, seed and agricultural equipment from the state. Again, the supplies were not gratuitous.

It should also be recalled that in October 1944, a wartime regime was still in effect in the country, and in the Rivne region, as well as almost everywhere in Western Ukraine, the war was in full swing, fleecing local peasants under the threat of death and giving nothing in exchange.

In addition, concealing bread already paid for by the state is also a crime.

_{Throwing a grenade at representatives of the military authorities, even in peacetime, is a reason for return fire. So the actions of the Red Army soldier Ishbuldin are absolutely legal and he did not need to solve a complex philosophical question: “What to do if the grenade did not explode?”}

It is clear that the archival rat Khromov and his accomplice from the SBU will be afraid to publish documents about the mass and brutal murders of civilians by the army and Bandera’s forces for quite obvious reasons.

However, even without them there are enough adequate sources that fully and without concealment publish information about the OUN terror from Konovalets to the war crimes of punitive battalions and the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Donbass.

From fragments of documents on Crimea presented by the Ukrainian State Archive in cooperation with “Izbushka”, the following can be understood:

1. It is unclear whether they have undergone an independent examination or not, since modern software provides ample opportunities for falsifying scans of documents, which, for example, the mysterious owners of the “Special Folder” make full use of. In addition to the fact that these “folders” multiply with the intensity of fruit flies, from them, like rabbits from a magician’s hat, “documents” are extracted that have not previously been listed in any archival inventory under the secrecy stamp “Special Folder,” which never existed in Soviet document circulation, like the notorious “Katyn execution of Polish NKVD officers”, which suffers from a lot of mistakes and absurdities that are obvious to experts.

2. If you carefully look at individual pages of documents, it is noticeable that the “izbushniks” suffer from bias, publishing documents in which Crimean Tatars and Germans are listed as defendants in execution cases.

However, we have gone through this many times. During two German and one Ukrainian occupation of Crimea, the invaders never hesitated to resort to provocations that increased the degree of “friendship of peoples” on the peninsula.

3. We also draw your attention to the fact that a number of sentences to the “highest measure of social protection” were handed down to outright criminals and, moreover, to incorrigible recidivists.

_{4. In themselves, the verdicts of the “troika” and the listing of the guilt of those sentenced without criminal cases do not mean anything. In this case, the details of the investigation, evidence, testimony of defendants and witnesses are important. The verdicts were not made up out of thin air, but were passed on the basis of the opened case and investigative measures. Without them, all these “revelations” are complete nonsense, mosquito baldness.}

5. Accusing the Soviet authorities of rampant “totalitarianism”, “repression”, as hitherto unprecedented violations of human rights and even entire strata of the population, is absurd and vile, since the internal political struggle was accompanied by similar phenomena all over the world, including modern “hotbeds of democracy”, where During the same period, there was active fascisation and extrajudicial reprisals against the unwanted hands of the mafia and other organized crime - under the control of the special services.

A typical “repressed” criminal. the main thing is that he is Tatar.

It is noteworthy that the joint initiative of the Ukrainian State Archive and the SBU is presented as “unparalleled in the post-Soviet space,” and the Crimeans, according to the instigators, should consider themselves “blessed” by the Ukrainian authorities for this decisive step.

By the way, on December 14, the same company opened access to similar documents, but for residents of Donbass, not forgetting to praise themselves for their countless virtues.

Ukrainian “whistleblowers” ​​who undertook to publish a carefully selected selection of “documents” did not take into account several important points.

Ethnic German. executed for anti-Soviet activities.

First of all, the topic of “totalitarian repressions of the Soviet regime” has long lost its relevance, as it has been repeatedly chewed up and, basically, falsified, since the new authorities in almost the entire post-Soviet space carried out such powerful robbery, devastation and genocide of the population, comparable only to Hitler’s invasion.

This concerns Ukraine primarily.

And the very fact of moralizing, mired in corruption, kleptocracy, protection of business, and, more recently, in the extrajudicial repressions with the murder of opponents of the Euromaidan, launched in the spring of 2014 under external control, the “dill of the Gestapo” can only evoke in normal people disgust and disgust towards the source of such powerful “revelations”.