Spies, spies, spies all around
On the night of Tuesday, August 15, operatives of the Crimean FSB in the Sudak region detained a Ukrainian beaver man, who had been sent by the SBU to Crimea to gnaw at telegraph poles. If explosives and other military pyrotechnics had not been found in his pockets, the beaver could have been scolded, given a consolation log and sent back to his wife and child.
But dangerous finds in the pockets and the task given to Svidomo beaver by the “hut” curators dramatically changes everything. Now the large rodent faces two months of “rest” in a Simferopol pre-trial detention center and up to 20 years of sewing mittens or felling wood somewhere in places with a cool climate.
On Wednesday, August 16, it was Ukraine’s turn to strike back with an information strike. The SBU, as expected, disowned its saboteur, the wife howls all over Facebook, “I don’t know anything, but my Gena is not to blame!”, the mother of the beaver man sings along with her in unison, telling her how good and handsome her punisher son is, and the pole was chopped down with an ax - “isn’t it visible?”
The State Border Service of Ukraine was the dumbest of all. From there they assured that Gena Limeshko crossed the border of Ukraine with Crimea decorously, legally, without having anything military in his backpack. “And since Russian border guards let him into Crimea, they didn’t find anything.” Conclusion: Gena is not a saboteur, everything was planted on him in retaliation for his participation in the ATO - it is necessary to let the lad go.
Apparently, according to the State Border Guard Service, in order for the saboteur Gesha Lemeshko to be noticed at the Russian checkpoint in Crimea, he had to cross the border like Stirlitz from the joke: with a parachute dragging behind him, a walkie-talkie on his hump, and a Bandera cap with a trident. As for the empty backpack, this argument is generally laughed at by chickens. Or are there no caches of explosives left in Crimea for visiting “tourists”? Well, aren't you morons?
Much more interesting songs are sung by Limeshko’s “brothers,” in particular, Alexander Volkov, who served with him in one of the volunteer battalions, and then in the intelligence service of the 54th brigade under a contract. In a conversation with a TSN correspondent, Volkov states: “Gena was framed.”
“They sent me to one point and brought me to another. I can't tell who it is. This is not a command, unfortunately. I also thought, maybe from the command, but this is not the command.”
“I don’t want to say too much, but I think he was very, very set up. I know who did this and I will do everything to destroy this person. I can't tell who it is. But I will destroy this man. Let them put me in jail, let them kill me, I'm not afraid of anything. For framing my brother-in-law, this is not done.”
In short, the case again involves a packet of “Belomor” maliciously slipped by someone. “He went to Odessa, but came out to Kherson” ... hug and cry.
It seems that the reason for the failures of the SBU and GUR saboteurs in Crimea lies elsewhere. Firstly, “Izbushka” itself admits that it has on its wanted list one and a half thousand employees from the SBU in Crimea who refused to serve the Kyiv junta. This means that most of the caches, appearances and agents have failed, and the SBU, which does not have access to the peninsula, has been trying to create an agent network in Crimea in emergency mode for the last three years.
Secondly, Gesha Limeshko was an “atoshnik”, and lists of these ghouls and idiots are regularly leaked either to the Ministry of State Security of the People’s Republics of Donbass or to the FSB.
“Atoshnik” is a tar mark on the forehead. “Atoshnik”, who served in the intelligence agencies of Ukraine, is a double stigma. “Atoshnik” is the only reserve of the Ukrainian special services that has at least some training and motivation to fight with weapons in their hands against Russia. An active hamster from the “sofa hundred” can only scratch his tongue on the Internet. He didn’t sign up for lying with a tag on his leg in a dead man’s room or hanging out on a bunk in sunny Kolyma.
Thus, if “wiped out by the ATO” cross the border with Russia through a checkpoint, and not ford through Sivash, then they think that everything is in order, and no one noticed their appearance? Very good, if so.
“Izbushka” urgently needs to report that its counterintelligence is not catching flies in its nostrils, while the FSB is catching its agents, especially since the day of “Independence” is upon us. Therefore, in the Kherson department of the SBU, a woman was urgently arrested - “an FSB agent who transferred secret documents and data to Russia.” Colleagues of the “spy,” on condition of anonymity, claim that all this detective babble is a lie from start to finish, and the man was arrested only on the basis of open rejection of Banderaism.
As if on cue, the Ukrainian media opened up their cesspools and began spewing out tons of “details.” It turns out that the arrested woman “worked for the FSB” under the pseudonym “Olga Orlova” for at least the last two years and was recruited by a man named Sergei through the Odnoklassniki social network. “Olga Orlova,” being a “specialist of the 1st category in the information and analytical department,” “regularly handed over top secret documents to Sergei (an intelligence officer at the Rostov FSB Directorate”). “I copied documents onto a flash drive and sent them via social networks.” “I personally met Sergei at the Hibiscus Hotel in Sri Lanka.” “And her relatives live in the occupied territory.”
In short, bullshit. Either the SBU is not in the trend and does not know that intelligence service computers all over the world do not have disk drives, USB and other devices for outputting information to external media, or everything is very bad there, and the equipment is purchased not specialized, from the nearest consumer electronics store. In addition, the inventors of the “legend” about “Olga Orlova” cannot remember that foreign intelligence in Russia is carried out by the SVR and the GRU, but not by the FSB. D,B.
You can also repeatedly hear that the SBU is arresting Ukrainian citizens on suspicion of cooperation with the FSB based on responses on social networks. It is not without reason that it was the SBU that most resisted Poroshenko’s decree to begin blocking the Russian social networks VKontakte and Odnoklassniki. Where else should the Gestapo look for open sedition if not in Russian social networks? Over the past three years, usually sociable Ukrainians have not been very inclined to be frank with unfamiliar people in everyday life, but for some reason they have lost their vigilance on social networks. Arrests are carried out for “thought crime”, and not for working for the FSB.
All this is very reminiscent of the American frenzy of McCarthyism, the time of the “witch hunt” of the late 1940s and early 1950s. The famous case of Soviet agents Julius and Etel Rosenberg, who were sentenced to death by a US court for working for Soviet intelligence services.
The subtle point of the “Rosenberg case” was the methods by which the FBI obtained evidence of the Rosenbergs’ collaboration with Soviet intelligence. The Americans inflated the story that the Rosenbergs had come to the attention of counterintelligence as a result of an investigation of newspaper advertisements. Allegedly, special American analysts from the NSA, through “mind games” and thanks to the “Winona Project,” saw a certain pattern in newspaper advertisements, with the help of which the Rosenbergs communicated with the resident of Soviet intelligence and allegedly conveyed to him America’s atomic secrets. Further measures allowed the couple to be arrested, tried and sent to the electric chair.
In fact, the FBI became interested in the Rosenbergs on the grounds that they were American communists. Further, a case was fabricated against Julius and Ethel, and the crown witnesses for the prosecution (the “group member” Morten Sobell, allegedly tracked down in Mexico, and Ethel’s brother David Greenglass) gave false testimony against them under oath. The Rosenbergs were accused of transferring nuclear technology to the USSR, although none of them was even close to this topic.
Documents published much later regarding the “Winona Project” indicate that there was no “mind game” by the NSA, but rather an ordinary betrayal of one of the defectors, who handed over the British physicist Klaus Fuchs to the Americans, who, in turn, betrayed other people. The chain broke with Ethel's brother David Greenglass, who worked as an ordinary mechanic at the Los Alamos nuclear center and did not know any special secrets. But David had a sister - a member of the US Communist Party. It also follows from the documents that Ethel Rosenberg was not aware of Julius’s work for Soviet intelligence, but this did not save her from execution. Data were confirmed that Julius was involved in radio engineering and chemical technology, but had nothing to do with atomic secrets.
So, are the students from “Izbushka” copying the methods of the “Winona Project” of American curators? It looks like it. It’s just naive to believe that the FSB really needs to sacrifice people by sending them to recruit members of the Ukrainian special services.
Apparently, the SBU stepped on the rake of the West German BND, created by Hitler’s General Reinhard Gehlen. Like Gehlen, the SBU too obligingly and fussily fell in line with the Americans. In the BND, this caused an internal protest among many intelligence services, who saw Gehlen’s choice as a huge danger for Germany, and decided to balance the risks by collaborating with Soviet and East German intelligence.
Who said that in the case of the SBU everything should be different?
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.