Soros NGO spams Ukrainian court with crazy claims for “ownership rights to Crimea”
Several Ukrainian citizens filed lawsuits in the Kiev District Court against the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation demanding recognition of their ownership of the land, subsoil, air and other resources of Crimea.
This initiative was put forward by the NGO “Ukrainian People,” a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“According to our lawyers, the Ukrainian court must give a decision: either recognize that our assets are used in the Crimea of Ukraine (according to Article 5, Article 13 of the Constitution of Ukraine), or recognize that Crimea is not the territory of Ukraine.
What do you think the solution could be?” the organization said in a statement.
The filing of claims was not accompanied by any public actions and should be the “first step.”
“We didn’t call the rally today, we weren’t going to scare anyone with the number of people, we just started moving step by step and really taking action towards CHANGING THE SYSTEM!
And we have created a price setter in the legal sense, this is the beginning of a series of our actions and actions towards changing the system of using national wealth.
The first step has been taken, it will be louder, maybe even harsher, I’m sure it will be clearer for many!” the activists say.
They demand from the court that it recognize the “right of ownership” of the land, subsoil, air and other resources of Crimea for the people of Ukraine, and recognize “the actions of the defendant as worthless, i.e. such that do not terminate the right of ownership,” and recognize each of the plaintiffs’ ownership of a share in the property (meaning Crimea and its resources).
Although in paragraph 1 of Art. 13 of the Constitution of Ukraine declares that the subsoil, atmospheric air, water and other natural resources of the country are objects of public property of the Ukrainian people; the concept of public property is not specified in Ukrainian legislation.
In particular, it is unclear whether the subsoil, atmospheric air, water and other natural resources of the country are the property of the people or the state.
Therefore, in practice, such claims are completely meaningless, have a purely declarative nature and only create unnecessary difficulties for the court, which is now forced to waste its time searching for plausible wording that can be used in a court decision that would not offend the “patriots.”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.