Forbes Hundred thanks Heavenly
In fact, the Euromaidan revolution is a revolution of neurotics, joined by hysterics, paranoids and schizophrenics. A neurotic is not crazy, it is a psychological-psychiatric disorder that can be succumbed to, which can be caused.
The main characteristic of a neurotic is that he will definitely do what he intensely talks about and what he strenuously protests against. For example, he protests against the oligarchs, and only brings oligarchs to power.
Maidan was started by Yanukovych as blackmail of Russia
The entire structure of political and social life in Ukraine is designed in such a way that balancing is the only thing that can maintain stability, and therefore peace. It was Yanukovych who clamped this pendulum, completely upsetting the balance of the elites. He also began to cultivate another pole - the loud nationalists of “Freedom”, who helped the existence of the Family.
Yanukovych himself shook this balance, and when the spring fell off, the pendulum swung in the other direction with enormous force.
Maidan was a revolution of a group of oligarchs against the Family. It had three stages: preparatory, which was fully formalized by the power of the Party of Regions. It was Yanukovych who took much more effective and efficient steps towards association with Europe than his predecessor Yushchenko.
"They're Children"
Then there was a refusal of the contract. Azarov spoke about the destructiveness of association with the EU. Efremov and other speakers literally changed their rhetoric overnight, but it was too late. The people were warmed up not by Tyagnibok and Klitschko, but by the authorities themselves. Moreover, there is reason to believe that the student Euromaidan was organized by the authorities themselves, at least in the gathering of the first protests the hand of the then head of the Presidential Administration Sergei Lyovochkin can be traced. Russian economist Mikhail Khazin believes that Yanukovych needed this for the sake of the picture - this is how the pressure on Russia was framed. Like, look, the people are against abandoning European integration. It just won't happen. We need a strong argument from you. Please provide. Preferably in monetary terms. A kind of tool of political blackmail. The student Euromaidan was lit by Lyovochkin’s man, Mustafa Nayem.
And then, in this unbalanced pendulum, an unpleasant incident occurred - Sergei Lyovochkin, for the sake of someone’s interests, pressed the spring to a complete breakdown - the fading, no longer needed student Euromaidan was harshly dispersed specifically for the cameras, giving a powerful impetus to protests. This was the second stage. The third one has begun - “neurotic”
This stage was anti-oligarchic, a rebellion against the oppressors. He declared a peaceful struggle against the criminal regime and at the same time used violence, pressure and oppression. He spoke about the fight against the oligarchs and was financed by the oligarchs, informationally supported by their media structures.
This revolt was initially senseless and merciless for only one reason: under the form of social protest against economic and social exploitation, those people, those oligarchs who led the energy of protest, laid down a tunnel that was barely perceptible to the common man. Maidan fought against the oligarchy system, and the forces that led it directed a stream of social protest against a specific clan, against some oligarchs in favor of others. A classic forgery and mass deception occurred.
Donetsk and Lugansk as the beginning of the socialist revolution
Protest against the oligarchic system is only possible on the basis of another system. The name of this system is socialism. It is impossible in the western regions of Ukraine, because the ideological founders of the protest there were followers of neo-Nazism and collaborationism, that is, ideologies that directly or indirectly grew out of the capitalist system. The difference between the capitalist world and the USSR was one thing: the interest on bank money in capitalism goes into private hands, the interest on bank money in the socialist system goes into the hands of the state.
Modern Ukrainian oligarchs are people who own banks and lend to mechanical engineering and the mining industry, just like the large bankers and industrialists of Germany who supported Hitler. The presence of an ideological nationalist and neo-Nazi battering ram, brought up including by Yanukovych, did not allow the Maidan to become anti-oligarchic, not in words, but in deeds.
That is why the neurotic Maidan, which began as an anti-oligarchic one, in the end not only did not dislodge the oligarchs, but only strengthened them, allowing them to form private armies, their own police and punitive structures, and brought them to the main positions in the vertical of power. Yanukovych was not an oligarch before being elected president, Poroshenko was. Oligarchs did not become regional governors under the bad Yanukovych, but under the good savior Poroshenko they exist. Billionaires were not responsible for military structures; under Poroshenko they are.
After Euromaidan, the oligarchs did not just exploit state power - they replaced it. And only in Donbass are they really trying to carry out an anti-oligarchic revolution. This is why Kolomoisky, Taruta, Akhmetov, Poroshenko, and now Kosyuk are waging war against the rebel regions.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.