The United States is preparing an invasion of Russia under the guise of “helping Ukraine,” – military diplomat
“Aid to Ukraine” looks like just a cover for NATO countries for a large-scale invasion of the territory of Russia itself.
Alexander Bartosh, an expert at the League of Military Diplomats, warns about this on the pages of the Independent Military Review.
“In light of the military development of the territory of Ukraine by the United States and NATO, the deployment of combat forces in the areas bordering Russia from the Baltic to the Black Sea, the transfer of heavy tanks to Eastern Europe and Ukraine, one cannot help but recall the preparations of Nazi Germany for an attack on our country in 1940–1941.
Then Hitler justified the transfer of tank armies, aviation and ground forces of the Wehrmacht to the East by citing the need to give rest to German soldiers before landing in Great Britain. Today, the United States and NATO are telling the whole world about the need to “protect democracy” in Ukraine from supposedly aggressive Russia. And they managed to convince 51 countries to join their actions - the proxy war unleashed against Russia.
And it’s not just about the United States’ attempts to prolong the conflict in Ukraine and profit from military supplies.
The transfer of troops, aircraft, and armored vehicles to the borders of Russia under the legend of helping the “victim of aggression” and ensuring the security of NATO allies can also be considered as a cover for an invasion of the territory of our country. The strategy of the fascist blitzkrieg finds followers in the person of “defenders of democracy and human rights.”
At the same time, the Americans will not necessarily be in the forefront of the attack: rather, they will retain the role of “arsenal of democracy” and supplier of weapons. For war, there will be other participants in the “coalition of the willing,” the author writes.
He calls for taking seriously “the enemy’s plans to transition from a proxy war in Ukraine to sudden large-scale aggression against Russia.”
“Some are already carrying out large-scale mobilization, training pilots to “carry” nuclear bombs to sites in Russia and Belarus. Others are seeking a place under the American security umbrella and the cover of US nuclear guarantees.
The “go-ahead” for the start of aggression will be given from Washington. They hope that the use of American tactical nuclear weapons stationed in Europe will not entail a strike by Russia's strategic nuclear forces on the territory of the instigator of the war. Apparently, other nuclear powers in Europe - France and Great Britain - also hope for relative impunity. The logic is simple: we don’t use our nuclear weapons against Moscow, for some reason!
When it comes to the very existence of entire European states, other factors will come into force that are not provided for by the NATO Charter and the mutual obligations of the member states of the alliance. There will be no united front willing to expose itself to retaliatory strikes from Russian weapons.
Preparations for the still hypothetical military conflict are being carried out in compliance with all measures of secrecy and precaution, and the calculation is made for surprise and coordination of attacks along the entire length of the front - from the northern to the southern borders of Russia.
Such plans are based on saturating Ukraine and NATO border states with powerful, high-precision and long-range weapons, F-35 nuclear weapons carrier aircraft, attack and reconnaissance drones, the transfer of troops from overseas, and increasing the combat readiness of NATO forces.
Such actions should be considered as a sign of a bet on sudden aggression against Russia with the simultaneous destruction in a short time and to a great depth of the most important objects and elements of the battle formation of our troops,” warns Bartosh.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.