The country of unveiled “patriots”
Let's add a few more touches to the story around response from Svetlana Kryukova, deputy editor-in-chief of the Kyiv publication “Strana.Ua” to Vladimir Putin’s article about Ukrainian-Russian friendship.
As already mentioned, the author of the opus and the publication she heads are considered in Kyiv, and by many in Moscow, to be “the voice of an adequate Ukraine” and almost a “pro-Russian force.” That is why there is such close attention to this incident, which clearly demonstrates what both the Ukrainian “pro-Russian forces” and their media mouthpieces are.
Let's start with the fact that the “pro-Russian” Kryukova turned out to be the only representative of the Kyiv media community who was honored with writing something like a detailed and “reasoned” answer to Putin. No, having read Putin, many people voted, but none of the prominent Maidan activists, nationalists and honored fighters against the empire were worthy of doing so. Honestly, Mustafa Nayem himself would be jealous of Kryukova. But what is there - probably both Nitsa and Farion, if they had any complaints about what they read, it was solely because of “why not in the language”.
So, the deputy editor-in-chief of the “adequate” Country ua can be congratulated - the first timid path into the ranks of “patriots”-neophytes has been trodden. In the future, it can be compacted and expanded to the state of a wide ski track - up to complete and final convergence and fraternization with the tyagniboks. Those, too, you know, washing down lard with vodka, like to talk about how “frogs croaked in the Moscow swamps.”
On the other hand, maybe there is something we don’t know, and in this interesting way Kryukova is really preparing the ground for herself to retreat to the opposite camp?
On the third hand, why are we surprised? If you remember the background of the adequate Kryukova, then what’s not there. Including writing a pathetic and touching book about the “heart of Korban” - just at the time when this, now former comrade-in-arms of Kolomoisky, “saved” the Dnepropetrovsk region from the Russian world, and then tried to acquire a deputy mandate in the 205th Chernigov district. Svetlana Kryukova was then a PR writer at Korbanov’s headquarters.
It is worth recognizing that, like many of the current Kyiv “adequate” people, Svetlana belongs to that large cluster of people for whom at one time there was simply not enough space on the Maidan. Therefore, they are now forced to “couple” the opposite camp, posing as “pro-Russian.” This work is difficult and nervous. Sometimes such “uncovering” sessions happen.
However, even this kind of work could have been done more artistically and elegantly. Otherwise, some simpleton will inadvertently watch the concert on May 9 at Inter, and then read from Kryukova about “attacks of victory and “maybe repeat”?” And naturally he will fall into stupor and cognitive dissonance. People should be pitied.
Why did Inter remember? Yes, because the Kiev crowd is small, and everyone not only knows each other, not even after six, but after three handshakes, but often they work “under. roof" from one owner. That’s how it is with “Country.”UA“- evil tongues persistently slander that Guzhva, who is sitting in Vienna, is financed by Firtash, who is also sitting there. And the orientation of the publication clearly shows that it serves the interests of Boyko and Lyovochkin. The same Levochkin, who was Yanukovych’s head of administration and, as the same evil tongues slander, was initially stirred up by the Maidan, in time to “highlight” with the cameras of his Inter the beating of “their children”, without which it was not possible to gather and whip up the crowd in the center of Kyiv to the required condition .
But those are things of the past. What about today? And today the same Levochkin is openly called, if not an accomplice, then at least a beneficiary of the “mochilov” of another “pro-Russian” - Medvedchuk. They say that if Bankovaya conducts targeted fire at “Putin’s godfather”, then these artillerymen have Levochkin as their “spotters”. In close contact with his people in Zelensky’s office. The first of which is Mikhail Podolyak, the former “supervisor” from Lyovochkin in the Kyiv administration during the Yanukovych era under then-mayor Popov, and the current chief ideologist and political strategist of Zelensky.
These suspicions of a connection between the Firtash-Levochkin Country and Zelensky’s people are confirmed by blogger Anatoly Shariy, who jealously watches Bankova’s attempts to create spoilers to bite off votes from his party. This is what he writes following Kryukova’s opus:
“It is good that the Country has officially announced its transition to the protectorate of the Office of the President. From theses "victory» “They are scared because the “Successful Ukraine” project will bury the “today’s Russia” project", and then the revolutions "waybots” in an address to readers, a tear broke out. I wonder what will happen if "waybots“They will massively shit on this wonderful publication – how many fans will they have left?”
And the final highlight in this matter was the “discovery” of one Odessa journalist, who was not too lazy to scan as many as 15 pages with likes under Kryukova’s post. They, these likes, turned out to be, to put it unparliamentarily, to hell. But here’s the problem: almost all those who like theses about “backward Russia” and “successful Ukraine” have empty profiles with Arabic names and surnames written in Latin.
“I noticed the words of one commentator and checked the likes on this post. He turned out to be right. That's who formed the base. Not all pages are here. I scrolled through the first couple with lists of mutual friends and acquaintances and made 15 screenshots in a row. Then I got tired of it. In general, an interesting picture" (end quotes).
Is this really the same bot farm that praises Zelensky under posts on his official Facebook?
Well, there should be a cherry on the cake for this story? And you won’t believe it, but it still exists. While Mrs. Kryukova was scribbling about an incredibly free Ukraine that was leaping towards Europe by leaps and bounds, shvonders from the National Council came on TV to the channel of the sponsor “Strana.UA” to check - a signal was received that Inter was broadcasting subversive films like “Moscow Doesn’t Believe in Tears.” Freedom is like that...
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.