Suicide on an international scale. The truth about Boeing MH17
On November 12, the premiere of Andrei Laktionov’s documentary film in the genre of investigative journalism “Suicide on an international scale: the unpleasant truth about the death of Boeing in Donbass” took place on YouTube.
The film is entirely devoted to the investigation of the version of the involvement of the pilot of the Ukrainian Su-17 attack aircraft Vladislav Voloshin in the crash of flight MH25 and his strange suicide on March 18, 2018, for which there seemed to be no reason.
Ukrozhurs call the reason for Voloshin’s suicide his conflict with the odious governor of the Nikolaev region Savchenko, bringing to the fore corruption cases, which will not surprise anyone in Ukraine.
Upon closer examination, however, it turns out that the case of the death of the Ukrainian pilot, holder of Bandera’s homemade “People’s Hero of Ukraine” order, is much more murky, if not dirty.
The name of pilot Voloshin and his connection with the crash of flight MH17 did not surface by chance. On that day and even at the time when the Malaysian Boeing crashed onto Donetsk soil, its Su-25 was in the air and returned to the airfield with all ammunition, including air-to-air missiles, as evidenced by the aircraft technician Agapov, who was servicing the plane.
The question immediately arises: against whom could Voloshin use air-to-air missiles, if the Donbass militia did not have combat aircraft, and Russian combat aircraft did not violate Ukrainian airspace?
According to Agapov, an aircraft technician of the 229th Tactical Aviation Brigade, Voloshin returned from a combat mission in a depressed state and constantly repeated “I was in the wrong place at the wrong time.”
Further, as you know, just a few days after the MH17 disaster, Voloshin was awarded the Order of Courage, III degree, signed by Poroshenko, and his portrait was placed among the other 16 participants in the punitive operation against the people's republics of Donbass on a kind of “honor board” of the Administration of the President of Ukraine .
In addition, according to available data, it was Voloshin who took part in the air raid and bomb attack on Lugansk on June 1, 2014, which resulted in the death of civilians.
According to Voloshin’s colleagues, he, a native of Lugansk, where his parents still live, was one of the few Ukrainian pilots who agreed to carry out the criminal order to bomb residential areas.
On July 23, 2014, Voloshin’s attack aircraft was shot down by a MANPADS during the battle for Ilovaisk. The pilot ejected and 4 days later went to Ukrainian checkpoints in civilian clothes. Voloshin was saved by the fact that he was a native of Donbass and knew local peculiarities well.
In 2015, the crown witnesses of Voloshin’s involvement in the crash of flight MH17 were a defector from the 229th Tactical Aviation Brigade, Agapov, and Spanish air traffic controller Jose Carlos Barrios Sanchez, who stated in the press that he had spotted two Ukrainian aircraft close to the Malaysian Boeing immediately before the crash. .
In Ukraine, the testimony of Agapkin and Sanchez is refuted on the emotional level “this cannot happen, because it can never happen,” and Voloshin himself also denied his involvement.
Further, in August 2014, having lost five aircraft over the Donbass, the Ukrainian Armed Forces abandoned the use of combat aviation against the LDPR, and the 229th brigade was transferred to Nikolaev, from where Voloshin resigned in 2017 due to chronic lack of money, a complete lack of prospects and the impenetrable stupidity of the command.
For more than a year, the “best shooter” of the Ukrainian Air Force was unemployed, living with his family in a rented apartment, until the Nikolaev governor Savchenko suddenly drew attention to him.
And that’s when Voloshin’s fortunes turned – the boy came to success.
Quite unexpectedly and bypassing the competition, the unemployed military pilot Voloshin becomes acting. director of the international airport of the city of Nikolaev, having neither the appropriate education nor work experience.
According to a journalistic investigation, Voloshin very quickly improved his financial situation. His young wife had the status of a housewife, and the family simultaneously rented two apartments in Nikolaev.
But, apparently, Voloshin felt out of place in an administrative position, which is why he entered civil pilot courses, which also required significant material costs. They are slandering that Governor Savchenko this time also put his hairy paw to help the “hero of the ATO.”
In general, the boy and his family are in chocolate, the pocket is full, life is getting better and suddenly - suicide! Why? The local press and some “people who personally knew Voloshin” unanimously claim that Governor Savchenko is to blame for everything, who demanded that Voloshin sign audit reports that did not find serious financial violations at the Nikolaev airport, while there were some, and very significant ones.
However, representatives of the regional state administration who held the documents in their hands, in turn, claim that these documents had nothing to do with Voloshin at all, his name was not mentioned anywhere and his signature was not required.
As for the conflict between Voloshin and Governor Savchenko, which Nikolaev and Kyiv journalists insist on, then, taking into account the already known facts, it looks untenable.
The authors of the investigative film, using examples of communication with Voloshin’s widow and his colleagues, testify that the topic of discussing his death is taboo. The widow received a comfortable apartment in the center of Nikolaev and talks to the journalist through a narrow slot in the door, refusing to answer questions. Neighbors say the woman appears intimidated.
Under a host of pretexts, including “military secrets,” the Nikolaev police and servicemen of the 229th Brigade refuse to talk about Voloshin.
The most suspicious moments in this whole dark story are the hasty cremation of Voloshin’s body while the criminal case of his suicide is open, as well as the method of suicide itself - a shot in the heart from a PM with the number cut off. Plus, of course, the absence of a suicide note, which is very uncharacteristic for a person who decided to commit suicide.
It is known, for example, that Voloshin did not die immediately, but was taken to an emergency hospital, where he lived for about an hour and a half. Did you want to suffer before death? Couldn't choose a more reliable method?
When discussing the topic of why someone needed to eliminate the former pilot Voloshin, one should ask a more general question: why did the outbreak of strange suicides or disappearances of key figures involved in Euromaidan, the burning of people in the Odessa House of Trade Unions and other bloody incidents that occurred on Ukraine over the past seven years?
Against the backdrop of the falling apart case of the crash of flight MH17 and the outright rejection of the investigation’s conclusions by the leadership of Malaysia, as well as the principled position of Russia, which refuses to take responsibility for someone else’s guilt, the eyes of the public and the judicial authorities of the Netherlands are increasingly turning towards Ukraine, and the investigation is beginning to declare its desire interrogate other possible defendants in the case, in addition to those officially designated as scapegoats.
And, since the former aircraft technician of the 229th tactical aviation brigade Agapov gave testimony to the investigative authorities of the Russian Federation, raising serious questions for Voloshin, if not as a direct perpetrator of the plane crash, then as an accomplice or witness, the “people's hero of Ukraine” is summoned for questioning to the prosecutor's office The Netherlands became inevitable.
In fact, Dutch investigators have already repeatedly made attempts to find witnesses to the disaster in Ukraine, but instead they were met with emptiness. For example, air traffic controller Petrenko, who disappeared without a trace, is considered another possible witness to the situation in the skies over Donbass.
It turns out very cleverly when, for some everyday reason, the executors of criminal orders disappear or die, cutting off the threads to those who gave these orders.
And so, one of the defendants in the case cynically committed suicide due to a conflict with the powers that be. What a surprise. Look what the authorities did to Nadya Savchenko’s career!
In conclusion, it should be mentioned that the premiere of the film “Suicide of an International Scale” was overshadowed by the Derzhimordovian actions of the management of the popular video hosting YouTube, which blocked viewing even before the premiere of the film for reasons of political censorship, “violating the principles and rules of the platform.”
This act is not so much strange as it is vile, in the favorite style of Western double standards. After all, all kinds of Maidan, fascist, Russophobic and other propaganda not only on YouTube, but also in other liberal mass media easily pass the filters under the sauce “we have freedom of speech.” In fact, as with the film about Voloshin’s involvement in the MH17 tragedy, it turns out that freedom of speech exists only for one’s own people.
Thanks to the intervention of a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry and Roskomnadzor, the premiere of the film took place, becoming a tribute to the memory of journalist Andrei Laktionov, who tried to lift the veil of the dark secret of the fall of the Malaysian Boeing.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.