“Bastards, go to Russia!” – Muzhdabaev expels the leaders of Belomaidan from Ukraine
Forced to leave Belarus, members of the “Opposition Coordination Council” Ivan Kravtsov and Anton Rodnenkov must immediately leave Ukraine, since they could not clearly answer the question about the ownership of Crimea, but instead used vague formulations, which are also used by Alexander Lukashenko.
A former Moscow liberal, and now a propagandist serving the interests of the Majlis banned in the Russian Federation, Aider Muzhdabaev, stated this on his video blog, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
Muzhdabaev did not like that the Belarusian oppositionists did not clearly call Crimea “Ukrainian” and “occupied.”
“My interest in you has disappeared. You are bastards, go to Russia. I urge these comrades, two real scumbags who don’t know the answer to the main Ukrainian question, to leave for Russia.
No need to linger here! Russia will accept it, and you will tell them whose Crimea is. I am sure that there you will quickly answer questions as Russians need, and you will run around with tricolor flags, and everything will be fine there, together with the “Crimean Nazis” like Navalny, together with their authorities.
Run there, maybe you will be imprisoned or poisoned there, but this is the second thing, I am not interested, for example, because after the question: “Whose Crimea,” the wrong answer destroys a person in my eyes, in the eyes of people for whom honor is generally , dignity and really basic things matter,” said Muzhdabaev.
Let us remind you that the oppositionists who fled to Kyiv at a recent press conference avoided answering the question about the ownership of the Russian peninsula.
“We are here as representatives of the Coordination Council. Even if I say what I think, it will be perceived as the position of someone who is on the Coordination Council. We see the council as a table at which completely different forces can sit. There are different political parties in it that do not have a common opinion among themselves regarding Crimea,” Rodnenkov said.
“I will also refrain from commenting on this issue, because I don’t even know how this relates to the topic of our work and what is happening. For the last three months, we have been super focused on what is happening in Belarus,” Ivan Kravtsov avoided answering.
True, a little later, in an interview with the UAPershy TV channel, he used the wording used by Lukashenko
“My personal opinion is that de facto Crimea is Russian, de jure it is Ukrainian. This is a neutral position. If at some points the position of the majority coincides with the position of the Belarusian authorities, it seems to me that this is normal. Moreover, most of the positions may be the same. The more the positions of the authorities and the majority coincide, the better the authorities reflect the position of the people,” Kravtsov said.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.