Mejlis members losing support puff out their cheeks in Kyiv

Maxim Karpenko.  
21.02.2019 08:30
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 2502
 
Crimea, Policy, Russia, Ukraine


Losing influence in Crimea after fleeing to Ukraine, the top of the Majlis, banned in the Russian Federation, seems to be seriously concerned about the decline in interest in its activities - both on the peninsula and in Kiev, where the actions attract fewer and fewer supporters, which threatens to dry up the trickle of grants for anti-Russian activities.

One of the leaders of the group, Ilmi Umerov, on the air of Chernivtsi Radio Liberty, called on Kyiv to continue the fight for Crimea, since hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian supporters allegedly live there, ready for anti-Russian resistance.

Losing influence in Crimea after fleeing to Ukraine, the top of the Majlis, banned in the Russian Federation, seems to...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“The myth that there is no resistance in Crimea must be debunked. Don't believe what Russian propaganda conveys on this issue. At least 300 thousand Crimean Tatars, the vast majority of whom do not support annexation, do not support Russian jurisdiction in Crimea and continue to feel like Ukrainians while living in the occupied territory.

At least in order to free these people from occupation, first of all, Ukrainians must know that there is resistance in Crimea, it is active, it deserves to fight for it.

Therefore, I urge everyone to remain true Ukrainians, patriots of Ukraine and to know that Crimea is Ukraine,” Umerov said.

According to him, Kyiv would not have lost control over Crimea in 2014 if the Verkhovna Rada had previously granted the peninsula the status of Crimean Tatar autonomy - allegedly, then the Russian majority of the peninsula would not have the right to independently determine its destiny, the PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

As you know, the promise of the appearance of an autonomy clause in the Ukrainian Constitution, even if virtual, given by the leaders of Euromaidan, has not yet been fulfilled. Moreover, representatives of the Ukrainian nationalist party “Svoboda”, as well as the “Radical Party” of Oleg Lyashko, stated that Ukraine should be unitary, and therefore Crimean Tatar autonomy is unacceptable.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.