Zelensky’s comrade-in-arms, who demanded to sterilize the poor, decided to take on the Armed Forces of Ukraine
A scandal is breaking out in Ukraine related to the intention to cancel benefits for demobilized military personnel.
A corresponding initiative was made by a deputy from the presidential party “Servant of the People”, head of the parliamentary committee on social policy and protection of the rights of veterans “Servant of the People” Galina Tretyakova.
“There is a big problem with lifelong benefits for combatants, which were once provided for in the current legislation,” Tretyakova said.
According to her, the new concept provides for benefits for combatants, which currently exist in the legislation, to be replaced with a two-three-year cash stipend or an additional payment to the basic income.
It is worth noting that earlier she spoke even more cynically regarding benefits to combatants.
“If it was a contract, and a person deliberately went to receive monetary support, sold his hired force in order to defend the country, it was his choice and only so,” the deputy said back in 2019.
Let us recall that it was Tretyakov called for the sterilization of the poor, because their children are “of very low quality.”
Her position was criticized by Andrei Pavlovsky, an expert on social policy issues and a member of the Rada of several previous convocations.
“When our defenders return from the front, they will see that they have returned to a completely different Ukraine, where they have no social or labor rights. All this will have to be restored through hard struggle,” writes Pavlovsky in the Kiev online publication “Zerkalo Nedeli.”
The logic with which he defends the need to preserve benefits for the military is noteworthy. On the one hand, the author admits that it is necessary to reduce the number of recipients of benefits, but they should not include the military, since “the time has not yet come.”
“Such anti-social initiatives during war can affect the mood and morale of our defenders. Such “state concern” is hardly a good signal to those who are now on the front line, at the front, who risk their lives and health every day. Of course, these people are not thinking about benefits now, nor about how the state will take care of them if they are seriously injured. But the idea that benefits for veterans is a pressing issue for social policy right now is outrageous.
This is immoral and dangerous. This is not just a parliamentary mistake, it is “zrada.” One step away from it is this indifferent bureaucratic “we don’t owe you anything,” and another step away is the completely seditious “we didn’t send you there.” It seems that our social policy is going the wrong way,” Pavlovsky is indignant.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.