Poroshenko decided to take a detour and dismiss the American protégé at NABU through the courts

Semyon Doroshenko.  
08.12.2017 20:17
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 6154
 
Kiev, Colonial democracy, Kompromat, Society, Policy, Скандал, Special services, Ukraine


A lawsuit is pending in the District Administrative Court of Kyiv against the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine regarding the legality of the appointment of Artem Sytnik as director of NABU, in particular, we are talking about a special check of his declaration as a candidate for this position, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook,  Classmates or In contact with

A lawsuit against the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine is pending in the District Administrative Court of Kyiv...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


The press service of the court reported this, Ukrinform reports.

“The District Administrative Court of Kyiv received a case on the legality of Sytnik’s appointment as director of NABU,” the statement says.

The press service explained that the District Administrative Court of Kyiv is considering a claim against the State Fiscal Service regarding a special audit of Sytnyk’s declaration as a candidate for the position of director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau. It is noted that in the preliminary court hearing the court involved Artem Sytnik as a third party as an individual.

“The essence of the claim is that on March 31, 2015, the day Sytnik submitted the updated declaration, the Procedure for logical and arithmetic control of the declaration of property, income, expenses and financial obligations, approved by the relevant order of the Ministry of Finance. At the same time, the new Procedure came into force only on April 30, 2015. At the same time, Sytnyk was recognized as having passed a special check, and by Decree of April 16, 2016, he was appointed director of NABU,” the court’s press service clarified.

They added that the plaintiff asks the court to recognize the actions of the State Fiscal Service as unlawful and to oblige them to send a message refuting the information about the accuracy of the information in Sytnik’s declaration for 2014, taking into account the updated declaration dated March 31, 2015. The plaintiff also asks to oblige the State Fiscal Service to send to the Presidential Administration and the relevant commission a message refuting the information regarding the reliability of the information in Sytnik’s declaration, taking into account the updated data.

Let us recall that the factions of the BPP and the Popular Front wanted to dismiss Sytnyk from his post by a resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but the US State Department came to his defense.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.