Ukraine is unhappy with the coercion of Minsk by the International Court of Justice

Olga Kozachenko.  
21.04.2017 09:17
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 1390
 
Policy, Russia, Ukraine


Ukrainian international lawyers are not happy with decisions of the International Court of Justice, who refused to acknowledge Russia’s financing of terrorism and pointed out the need for both Moscow and Kiev to implement the Minsk agreements.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, FacebookClassmates or In contact with

Ukrainian international lawyers are not happy with the decision of the International Court of Justice, which refused to recognize financing by Russia...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


Thus, in a comment to Apostrophe, former Commissioner for the European Court of Human Rights Boris Babin said that for Russia the indication of the need to implement the agreements signed in Minsk is “unpleasant, but not fatal.” The expert is much more concerned that a similar demand was made in relation to Ukraine, for which, Babin believes, the Minsk agreements are extremely unfavorable.

At the same time, the publication’s interlocutor called Ukraine’s position in terms of the Convention on Combating the Financing of Terrorism difficult.

“Our Foreign Ministry as a whole was a hostage to the position that the authorities occupied for a long time and, unfortunately, continues to occupy - in contradiction to the norms of international law. For a long time, at the official level, we could not decide on the status of the occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. All the errors and shortcomings of Ukraine’s position in court follow from this,” Babin believes.

He also recalled that the court directly indicated that it could not consider the case more broadly than Ukraine wants to consider it.

“I don’t want to say that we will lose this case: we may still reach some result on the financing of terrorism, but in any case it will be a compromise and quite soft,” Babin admits.

He also drew attention to the fact that even the Russian judge voted for the thesis on teaching in the Ukrainian language. This, according to the Ukrainian expert, will allow Russia, in theory, to find a legal way out in the case of the demand to lift the Mejlis ban.

Read also: In Crimea will there be a pro-Russian Mejlis?

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.