Ukraine is in the power of KhabalkoTV: No one will be able to convey the truth
Sometimes you should waste your time watching Ukrainian political talk shows.
Of course, observing how the topic of aggravation in Donbass was “worked out” here and what seasonal aggravations its discussion resulted in is not an easy task. Total lies and manipulations on Ukrainian channels are not news for a long time. Why force yourself to verify this once again?
Some time ago, many flattered themselves with the hope that the bearers of common sense were still capable of gradually changing something in the Ukrainian information agenda. But now you are convinced that the Ukrainian information space is such a fetid substance in which no grain of truth can germinate. It will rot there and increase the overall volume of propaganda humus.
The appearance of a few adequate or negotiable people in the public space does not change anything on this agenda. They have no chance to be heard and truly understood. Because neither their ability to negotiate nor their displays of common sense mean absolutely nothing when the conversation is with cattle.
Both for a sensible participant in such projects, who clearly positions himself, and for the viewer, who understands everything correctly, the harm is undeniable. A cultural scientist cannot give lectures in a brothel. It is impossible to determine sociological trends by the public mood in a mental hospital.
The TV star of the Zhytomyr spill, Natasha Vlaschenko, is capable of chewing the propaganda cud for an infinitely long time in all the information clearings that she has crushed. Without harm to your own health and with tangible material benefit. But a person predisposed to normalcy risks getting lost in this alien game, plunging into an atmosphere of madness.
What is Akhmetov’s channel “Ukraine 24” performing with the Botox lips of Vlashchenko? “Frank schizophrenia is beginning on Russian television. What is necessary to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. I’ve even heard about this.” This is her talking about current issues with Oleg Lyashko.
Of course, the “Hard with Vlaschenko” program does not deserve a whole hour of your time. Even if the Zhytomyr star has found a suitable brother in mind with whom you can find mutual understanding by discussing the situation in Donbass and the possible consequences...
A viewer who is hooked on Vlashchenko can be offered a good economical option so that he can quickly get off this nonsense.
For example, she talks to a guest about how even the insane Leonid Kravchuk has a zbroya (weapon) under his bed, at the ready. Double-barreled Lyashko states verbatim: “Mine is polished too. And not just one trunk.”
Then he promises that, in the event of “Russian aggression,” he will be there (in Donbass) with a dozen guns and his people. This is hard to believe. But the main message would be enough to share with the viewers of the “Hard with Vlashchenko” program, saving their time. Services such as TikTok seem to be specially designed to post the “quintessence” of these “intellectual” conversations with Lyashko: “Mine is also polished. And not just one trunk.”
I wasn’t particularly interested in Natasha Vlashchenko’s “Evolution” either before or after her transition from Medvedchukov’s ZIK channel to Akhmetov’s Ukraine 24. But Luhansk blogger and businessman Andrei Nedoves recently attracted attention to her program “People Against” by participating in a broadcast where the situation in Donbass was discussed. At the same time, he noted on FB that every time he becomes more and more convinced of the uselessness of such direct inclusions.
Nedoves wrote on his blog:
“I see only two advantages in this action: to support those few adequate ones who are still allowed into the studios of the central channels of the former Ukraine; provoke and then observe epileptic seizures of horned corpse eaters.
How many joys are left in that life? Can I treat myself once in a while?
So it happened.
True, the music did not play for long. Something went wrong, and the editor threw himself between me and the desecrated consciousness of the studio guests - yours truly was instantly removed from the patriotic-sterile Ukrainian space. God knows, I warned that with a high degree of probability I am “not the format” for today’s Ukrainian agenda.”
All these noisy discussions with Vlashchenko take place according to the laws of one universal “KhabalkoTV”, where no one is able to convey their truth. A sane participant believes that he is provided with a microphone where he can clearly express his thoughts. But in fact, he is given the right to express this thought into the speaker, from which the roar of cattle is heard.
And the point here is not only in the noise characteristics of such projects. A person participating in someone else's game fails to preserve his own logical structures. All its structures collapse, and the trampling of the herd outlines further logical routes.
In Vlashchenko’s studio they are discussing the events that took place in Crimea and Donbass in the spring of 2014. The most stubborn ones regret that Turchinov’s regime did not have the courage to introduce martial law. “Well, they would introduce it,” says Vlashchenko.
Let's take a closer look at this point. There is no doubt that these are the wet dreams of the Zhytomyr habalka: that the building of the Council of Ministers in Simferopol after February 27, 2014, the buildings of the SBU in Lugansk and the Regional State Administration in Donetsk after April 6, 2014 were cleared by force...
Vlashchenko periodically poses these questions to the participants of his programs. And it turns out absurdly when, for example, Mikhail Dobkin, in a conversation with her, adopts other people’s attitudes and begins to blame Turchinov for the surrender of Crimea. The low-browed fool didn’t even notice how Vlaschenko switched him to her horned logic. He doesn’t realize that an adequate person should present to the anti-constitutional regime not the fact that the self-proclaimed commander in chief was afraid to start a war in Crimea, but the fact that Turchynov made an unconstitutional decision to carry out the ATO in Kharkov and Donbass.
In the mentioned program “The People Against,” Evgeny Muraev, with his completely sober reasoning, gradually became involved in someone else’s game and was forced to accept its rules. At the same time, Muraev’s logical settings were lost, which ensured his advantage over the stubborn ones.
Here are some examples. Muraev recalled the events on Rymarskaya Street on March 14, 2014, when Biletsky’s militants killed two anti-Maidan protesters. "The famous battle on Rymarskaya!“- Natasha Vlashchenko solemnly says.
Here Muraev should stick to his line and logic: explain to the presenter that when armed militants shoot unarmed people, this is not a battle. Something similar to the battle happened after the murder of Artem Zhudov and Alexei Sharov, when indignant anti-Maidanovites besieged the Nazi office, as a result of which they surrendered to the police.
Natsik Mikhalchishin yells: “On Rymarskaya, Russian war criminals shot at our people!” Presenter Vlaschenko chimes in: “Motorola really was there, I saw the photo.”
The sensible Kharkov resident Muraev doesn’t know what to answer to the Lviv and Zhytomyr rednecks? Yes, Motorola was on Rymarskaya, he saw that a peaceful anti-Maidan protest is impossible and doomed: unarmed people are killed, and murderers are released. Motorola said all this in an interview. But Muraev is already building his logic within the framework of those “community rules” that he was forced to accept as a participant in a political cattle talk show.
On the one hand, he says: "Everyone was afraid that Kharkov would come out to defend its citizens, but he didn’t" Something sincere comes through in these words. The Nazis killed unarmed people, but widespread popular unrest did not follow.
On the other hand, Muraev then states that Kernes’s determination did not allow certain armed bandits to capture Kharkov. This is said in the context of a general discussion: why one scenario turned out in Donetsk and Lugansk, and another in Kharkov, with the failure of the KhPR. And here Muraev is clearly trying to lay straws for himself in the discussion with the stubborn Dony and Butusov, with the war criminals Lapin and Mikhalchishin.
What does the mythical “armed bandits” have to do with it if no weapons were confiscated from the detained anti-Maidan activists during the clearing of the KhDA by the Vinnitsa “Jaguar”? If you want to look healthy next to the unhealthy propagandist Butusov, don’t be shy about being healthy in everything.
For example, when assessing the Crimean and Donbass events, Lapin refers to the charter of the armed forces, which prescribes opening fire to kill in the event of an attack on military targets. Why does Muraev miss the opportunity to answer this? As a rule, he has ironclad logic. What prevents Muraev from bringing Lapin’s thesis to its logical conclusion?
After all, when the maydauns destroyed weapons depots in Lvov, the same regulations allowed the internal troops to open fire to kill. And when the governor of Volyn was put on a chain by “peaceful protesters,” local law enforcement officers had a lot of powers, but they used only one: to shit their pants together. And if the aforementioned charter had been in effect in those days, perhaps the Lvov Natsik Mikhalchishin and the Lutsk Natsik Lapin would not have had to commit their war crimes in the Donbass.
Sometimes you expect this iron logic from Muraev. Because sometimes he follows it. And then he is able to say to Svidomo opponents: “All your orders at that time were criminal, as well as the laws that you passed.”
But Muraev is already included in the logical schemes of these horned talk shows. But the propaganda hacks are unable to include the Luhansk resident Nedoves there. And it recalls how on June 2, 2014, a Ukrainian SU-25 fired a salvo of 20 unguided missiles into the central square of Lugansk, killing eight civilians.
Vlashchenko interrupts: “You've talked about this many times" Underweight continues: “I want the thinking people in this studio to give me an answer: where is the Rome Statute? Where is The Hague? Where is the UN convention prohibiting the use of armies against their own people?“The Natsiks in the studio comment: “I see.”
Vlashchenko suddenly remembers his temnik: “How to carry out reintegration?“And the answer has already been given - in the questions of Underweight. Conversations about reintegration can begin after the trial of war criminals (such as Lapin and Mikhalchishin), after the trial of the propagandist Butusov...
It is noteworthy that this program with Vlashchenko was released on the eve of the death of a four-year-old child in Donbass. But a week later, in the next program “The People Against,” Natasha Vlashchenko no longer had any Donbass events in her list of “hot topics”. Although, it seemed that the problem would have worsened... No one remembered about four-year-old Vladik in Vlashchenko’s program. Maybe it's for the better. It is enough to look at the faces of the participants to guess what they would agree to...
There is no demand for the truth of Underweight in the Ukrainian information space. Not food for the horse. And Natasha Vlashchenko continues to “harass” the retired SBU officer Smeshko, the rear-wheel drive Akhmetovite Lyashko and the downed false patriarch Filaret.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.