Crimea fell away from you: How a schoolboy in Kyiv discussed the failure of Ukrainian propaganda
Monday is a hard day. But it was on Monday, September 21, that a group of “experts” from Soros grant-eaters and officials on “deoccupation and reintegration” gathered in Kiev to discuss a difficult question: why inside Ukraine no one except them, the sick, is interested in the topic of the return of Crimea and how to stir up there is public interest in it.
The press was different in that this time its participants were representatives of the Ze!-team and not a single hardened sewer from the “powderbots”.
The “experts” were represented by young Soros from a grant-eating shop with the fanciful name of ShPA NaUKMA (School of Political Analytics at the National University of Kiev-Mohyla Academy), as well as officials from the relevant ministry “for the occupied territories.”
The gang was paid for by Soros's Vidrodzhennia office, which has taken deep roots in Ukraine, as well as the Swedish embassy in Kyiv, which is passionate about restoring the territorial integrity of Ukraine within the 1992 borders.
The Soros kids knew a lot of smart words, like “institutional” and “content,” which they deftly juggled, but at the same time they were shamefully young. Youth in itself is not a sin, but when state affairs are frayed by an inexperienced schoolboy, you want to take a belt and in a stern voice order her to return to the sandbox.
The director of the ShPA NaUKMA, Maxim Yakovlev, despite the regalia of a “candidate of political sciences,” was the same green snot as most other “experts,” differing from them only in the glasses on his nose.
Protective masks worn by experts gave the event the appearance of a textbook medical consultation, huddled over the wooden body of Pinocchio, whose members could not agree: the patient is more likely dead than alive, or vice versa.
And the patient, that is, the topic of “de-occupation of Crimea,” is deader than dead, which those gathered did not want to admit, encouraging themselves and their colleagues with incantations “Crimea is Ukraine,” apparently trying to challenge the old saying about the word “halva” pronounced a thousand times in order to increasing sugar levels in the body.
In order not to bore the reader with the details of the hour-long bleating, confused reading from a piece of paper and confidently blurted out statements of the assembled “de-occupiers”, we will present only the most delicious extracts from their speeches.
First of all, participants in the discussion of the study “Crimea: out of reach?” agreed that “the topic of Crimea is not sufficiently covered in the leading Ukrainian media, and in some regions it is not covered at all.”
After such a recognition, people who have at least a drop of self-respect left leave the gathering and switch to some more socially useful work. Well, at least picking up trash or laying asphalt. But in the hall gathered ideological sewers of a new generation on the payroll of Soros and the Swedish Embassy, and such people do not suffer from disgust and the shame will not eat into their eyes: the banquet has been paid for - let's walk on!
The young grant-eater Veronika Usacheva, scurrying, darting and constantly losing the thread of her report, told a terrible story: according to the National Council for Television and Radio Broadcasting, the topic of Crimea on the most influential TV channels in Ukraine occupies from zero to one percent.
At the same time, it was funny to observe how the participants in the discussion were childishly happy that one all-Ukrainian television channel was still constantly working in Crimea, “carrying the voice of truth” right up to Sevastopol and the South Coast.
The author of the study expressed an optimistic wish that it is necessary to somehow return the Crimean issue to the permanent agenda of the Ukrainian media.
Apparently, realizing perfectly well that all the grant-eaters of the ShPA NaUKMA taken together will not be able to bend the owners of central TV channels, like Poroshenko, Kolomoisky, Pinchuk and Akhmetov, who themselves can bend anyone, the expert girl suggested starting with the regions so that they would voice more cheerfully the topic of Crimea in the local media, because, they say, “it is discussed more actively in Kyiv.”
Official Kashinets from the Ministry of “De-Occupation” supported the grant-eater, expressing the idea that such an imbalance creates “an information and communication vacuum around the topic of Crimea.”
According to the “de-occupier,” this whole vacuum is formed as a result of working according to the formula “nose out, tail stuck.” When the government devotes more advocacy efforts to some areas, other areas are left unreached.
It turns out that there is little state presence in these areas, and the relevant ministry would like to force local councils and regional state administrations, which apparently have nothing else to do, to join the anti-Crimean propaganda.
The bespectacled man and director of the ShPA NaUKMA, Maksimka Yakovlev, did not disappoint and gave a scientific speech in which he drew the attention of those present to “two important components in the state information policy regarding Crimea - institutional and content.”
For one “forms messages”, and the other “institutional frameworks”. And it is not very clear to the “expert” how to “synthesize” them, since “these are two separate directions.”
Personally, Yakovlev’s speech reminded me of the response of a student who was not prepared for the lesson and was called by the teacher to answer. A boy with a well-spoken tongue tried to fill the teacher’s ears with scientific chatter, but the attempt did not go well.
It’s a pity that you can’t put a “stake” in Yakovlev’s diary and magazine, call the pope to kick the ears of the careless heir, but if Soros and Sweden allocate funds so that their Ukrainian charges aimlessly drive empty from year to year, so be it.
The participants devoted the remaining time of the press conference to discussing that it would be a good idea to “fill the media with relevant content” so that “residents of the occupied territories know that in Ukraine they are remembered and take certain actions” and so on “Crimea is Ukraine!”
Apparently, the new degeneration of Ze!-propagandists will achieve even less success than their predecessors from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other relevant departments.
It is difficult to imagine that grant-eating lice could influence the broadcasting network of central Ukrainian television channels and awaken interest among peripheral TV channels in covering the Crimean topic, which is of no interest to anyone, against the backdrop of general impoverishment, the COVID-19 epidemic, utility tariffs and medical services within the framework of jihad.
Even ideological shareholders have long come to terms with the idea that Crimea is a cut-off piece, and it cannot be sewn and glued back to Ukraine, and only wretched talkers on a salary continue to fight with their tongues and cling to the unrealizable.
What kind of “content” can we even talk about? “The horrors of the Russian occupation of Crimea” are in demand among the skinny layer of the population, for whom the psychiatric hospital has been crying for a long time, and those who regularly visit Crimea on business or on vacation understand the difference between propaganda insinuations and the actual state of affairs. He will also tell other people.
In general, the “research” of the Soros from the NaUKMA ShPA is nothing more than a children’s wish list for Santa Claus and confirmation of their complete incompetence. Dixi.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.