The Ukrainian side brazenly falsifies evidence at the MH17 trial in the Netherlands
All the evidence with which they try to point to Russia at the trial in the Netherlands for the Boeing shot down over Donbass is initially built on speculation and inconsistencies.
Historian and political scientist Vladimir Kornilov stated this on the Rossiya 1 TV channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
&
“As for the MH17 trial, I looked through everything carefully, looked at further evidence that Ukraine is outright lying. For example, prosecutors presented a map where the Ukrainian government retroactively redrew the map; superimpose their map of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of that period, and you will see dramatic changes. They did everything to portray that the territory from which the Buk shot allegedly came was under the control of the “separatists.”
Here, in fact, is the map, you see, much further south they marked in red that this territory was owned by “separatists”. But look closely, the most important thing is that, according to the Ukrainian authorities, all of Lugansk in mid-July 2014 was controlled by Ukraine. Did you know? And this was presented by prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian authorities, this is a map for July 2014 - this is called forgery of material evidence! And this is presented today as material evidence,” Kornilov said.
“And when the accused, in particular Pulatov, the only one who represented his lawyer there, asked, let us at least question the witnesses, they were told: no, everything is classified. That is, take my word for it. Just like you trust the Americans about satellite images. Where did they go, why are they not there? The answer is obvious - Americans don’t want anything for the public to see. And we can guess what.
Probably because Dutch independent journalists presented an investigation into the presence of Ukrainian planes at this very time in this very place. There are a lot of witnesses, they were even shown on Ukrainian TV - they are not present at this trial. Dutch prosecutors decided not to involve these inconvenient witnesses. They even stated that Russia allegedly pays for the testimony of those who support versions other than the official one,” the historian added.
“Excuse me, I think these are the ones who gave the investigation the whole body of the Buk missile, which these investigators showed to the whole world, all the newspapers came out with a photo on the front page - this is the same Russian missile that shot down that same ill-fated Boeing " When the Russian Ministry of Defense presented the serial number, proving that this missile belonged to the military units of the Ukrainian SSR since 1989, and everything to the Ukrainian Armed Forces since 1991, they immediately lost interest in the missile. I looked at how the material evidence was presented, all sorts of fragments and so on - I don’t see this body anywhere, where did it go, will anyone ask this question?” – Kornilov was indignant.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.