Ukrainian plan "Ost": the secret springs of war
The historical experience of Maidan 2014 will remain in history as a brilliant example of how, with the help of manipulative technologies, people’s protests can be redirected against some oligarchs and to the benefit of others. And for those who already see and understand this, it is difficult to agree with the cries of the “masses” enchanted by the Maidan: “we are not cattle, we are not suckers.” What is this then, if not a nationwide scam, which would not be possible if people understood how they are being used? True, as we see, understanding is coming. People are increasingly realizing that they were duped, first forced to overthrow the legitimate government, and then to fight against those who did not agree with their choice. They realize that the main danger to Ukraine is not Russia and the so-called. “separatists”, but “their own” oligarchs and those who stand behind them.
After the collapse of the USSR, all “people's property” became easy prey for looters who acted boldly, aggressively, mercilessly, eliminating their competitors by any means, regardless of any morality or laws.
One of these looters was Igor Kolomoisky, who, as a result of the Maidan, received unlimited power in the Dnepropetrovsk region. At one time, the list of his victims was published under oath to a London court by the famous businessman Konstantin Grigorishin. This list includes former business partners, competitors, and those who tried to “spin” criminal cases against Kolomoisky.
Thus, his empire was created on blood. A state within a state that has now reached its peak. And this fact worries not only Ukrainians. It is known that due to the aggressive actions of the oligarch Kolomoisky, the Americans declared the Dnipropetrovsk region a dangerous zone for businessmen, and in February 2009, Kolomoisky was banned from entering the United States. His name was even mentioned in the report of US Justice Secretary Michael Mukasey as a person whose activities pose a real threat to the national security of the countries of Europe and the United States. Presumably due to total corruption. But, as it now turns out, the situation in 2009, against the backdrop of the current war and the transfer of entire regions of Ukraine to direct “feeding” to the oligarchs, even looks nice.
Now it is precisely people like Kolomoisky who are entrusted with the fate of Ukraine. And he has not yet received what he wanted and planned by starting the “Euromaidan” and financing the Nazi VO “Freedom” and “Right Sector”.
By the way, this very delicate, but extremely important circumstance for further analysis of what is happening shows that calling the war in Ukraine a civil war is not very correct and correct. Indeed, in a civil war, one side does not consider its opponents and adversaries as “subhumans” and “Colorados” (that is, insects) that must be destroyed. And this is exactly what we are seeing in Ukraine. Moreover, the nature of the war in Ukraine is becoming more and more colonial, where the role of feeding the “center” of the “periphery” is played by the Southeast, occupied and devastated by the Ukrainian army.
True, this colonial war has its own peculiarity. It lies in the fact that throughout the years of Ukrainian independence, the southeast of Ukraine was an economic donor and a socio-cultural colony of Kyiv and Galicia. Now he, having dared to fight for his rights, has become the object of direct military expansion. And it immediately became clear that the Kyiv authorities had their own Ukrainian plan “Ost” in relation to him, without the successful implementation of which present-day Ukraine would not be able to exist. And it can only be accomplished with the help of Nazi ideology.
Moreover, the situation is such that it is easier for the Kyiv authorities to completely clear the population of the South-East than to recognize them as equals and give them full civil rights in accordance with the Ukrainian Constitution. Clear by creating a humanitarian catastrophe, when residents find themselves in conditions incompatible with life, are filtered out, partially destroyed or flee, freeing up these territories for their further use.
Moreover, against the backdrop of the fact that Ukraine is increasingly losing its ability to reproduce itself and has exhausted Soviet-era resources that were used without planned restoration, the new stage of redistribution will be especially uncompromising and tragic for the participants and those around them. And if we consider that many oligarchs, following the example of Kolomoisky, began to acquire their own personal army, it is possible that the war in Novorossiya is the prologue to a war between oligarchs for absolute power, which will manifest itself in the military dictatorship of one of them.
True, the people of Ukraine no longer want to fight for the oligarchs. On July 16, in Kyiv, wives and mothers of military personnel picketed the Presidential Administration building. “Whose mines are those? Whose bowels are those? Whose rivers? Everything is privatized. And we have to lay our heads down, for what? They stole billions, let them invest their billions, hire their people and let them fight. Or let them take their children and fight there, keeping parasites,” they said, referring to the Kyiv authorities. True, it is unlikely that such picketers, or the entire people of Ukraine, will be able to stop this massacre. The epiphany came too late. And now the fate of Ukraine does not depend on Ukraine itself.
Let us remember that oligarchism is not designed for a historical breakthrough and the welfare of citizens. Its task, at best, is to maintain the existing state of affairs - the status quo, the meaning of which is to obtain maximum profit from the territory of “feeding”. And for this reason alone we can assume that Ukrainian oligarchs are essentially temporary breadwinners, looters, trophy hunters. Their actions can be boiled down to what the former speaker of the Ukrainian parliament, Vladimir Lytvyn, called “grabbing and snatching.” And war gives these actions unprecedented opportunities.
From this point of view, war becomes natural and necessary for them. She alone justifies sacrifices and writes off sins.
The “black hole” of the war will draw in new Ukrainian territories, calling the very existence of Ukraine into question, but the opportunities for the redistribution of property, if the war continues, will only increase for the oligarchs. And the oligarchs who won with the help of Euromaidan understand this. They feel the risk. But so does the opportunity to make money. And they will risk everything: the country, people, capital, their loved ones. Because that is their nature. In this sense, they are suicides. But before death they are given a chance to steer a little.
At the same time, while the oligarchs who won with the help of the Maidan “rule” and “saw” what they can profit from at the expense of their weakened or losing competitors, Ukraine itself will be “ruled” and “sawed” by others. In pieces. Spheres. By industry. Regions. And the “Deal” with the EU, which Poroshenko recently signed, creates favorable conditions for this.
In other words, in this case it should be taken into account that the oligarchism of Ukraine is built into the world order, where economically Ukraine is subordinate to the EU, and politically to America. Submits without any pre-agreed conditions that would somehow soften this transition.
In the Ukrainian crisis, a three-level structure emerges, when covered by the so-called. An “anti-terrorist operation” against “separatists”, the raider seizure of New Russia by the Nazis, in turn, turns out to be a cover for the raider seizure and use of the entire Ukraine in the Ost plan regime. This is evidenced by the content of the “Deal” with the EU, and plans for the development of shale gas, and the current redistribution of property.
And what awaits Ukraine itself after all this? Does anyone still not understand?
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.