There will be a Ukrainian village without access to the sea!

Celebrations have begun in Crimea on the occasion of the next anniversary of the beginning of the Russian Spring. The population of the peninsula perceives the Ukrainian period of its history as a severe and prolonged illness that took a lot of strength and health, almost ending in death. Four years ago, a miraculous healing took place, and Crimeans expect only good things from the future, especially hoping for the speedy commissioning of the bridge across the Kerch Strait.

Ukrainian independentists, adherents of sacred unitarianism and conciliarity, do not look to the future, refuse to conduct a calm and thoughtful dialogue with the breakaway territories, engaging in scratching out sores, savoring phantom pains, reaching the point of masochism and self-torture.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

The motto “Crimea is Ukraine” has long become a delusional national idea, in support of which more and more new evidence is being found, carefully put into a piggy bank in order to present its contents in the face of the “world community” at the right opportunity. This practice is one-sided, when preferences are given to any insignificant information in one’s favor while pointedly ignoring inconvenient facts.

So, the other day the famous Maidan political leader Portnikov stuck out his mug in “Crimea.Brekhaliy” with a new portion of “proving”, which in a mysterious way should affect the current status of the peninsula as part of the Russian Federation.

Portnikov’s “evidence” in favor of “Crimea is Ukraine” boils down to the fact that the decision to transfer the peninsula to Ukraine in 1954 was made by Malenkov, not Khrushchev.

It would seem, what difference does it make who signed the illegal order to change the administrative boundaries of the Union republics, bypassing the legislation of the USSR? For Portnikov and those for whom he works, not sparing his sphincter, the difference turns out to be significant and has a certain sacred meaning.

Who is Khrushchev (according to Portnikov) in the Russian public consciousness? Some kind of stupid little crest who danced the hopak to the accordion at Stalin’s feasts for a narrow circle of those close to him. The time has come, and Seluk Nikita brought Crimea as a gift to the Ukrainian party nomenklatura on a silver platter. With the only condition - to restore the post-war devastation.

Malenkov is a completely different matter. One hundred percent Russian, Stalin’s successor, chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR. A man of position and real power. It’s not like the troublemaker Nikita, always jumping like a goat in a blouse. A respectable person, with a solid decision, solidly transfers the Crimean region to Ukraine, not as an act of voluntarism, but as a result of careful consideration: Crimea is yours, forever, dear Ukrainian comrades!

As proof, Portnikov invites everyone to visit Wikipedia and study the article about Georgy Malenkov. Checkmate, cotton wool! Please give Crimea back, plus hundreds of billions of reparations and free gas and oil for Nenka, who suffered for life!

What do you say to this? Only that Portnikov is a loser and an amateur in the history of the CPSU. In 1954, Malenkov was no longer a cake, since in 1953 he personally transferred the fullness of party power to Nikita Khrushchev.

Only a very stupid “expert” can believe that party power in the USSR was worth little. There is no other way to explain why all the most important issues within the country and in the international arena were adopted and signed at the level of the General (First) Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee. It was the Secretary General who, with the consent of his Politburo comrades, could replace the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, and not vice versa. Accordingly, in 1954, Crimea was transferred to the Ukrainian SSR by Khrushchev, and not by Malenkov, who a year later would be replaced as head of the Union Council of Ministers by Bulganin, and in 1957 they would leave power for opposition and stop mentioning him in the press and school textbooks for many years.

And these historical details do not play a special role in disputes about the ownership of Crimea. Redrawing, albeit illegal, the administrative borders of the Union republics is a slightly different calico than redrawing interstate borders. And it’s even more stupid to compare Nenka with the Ukrainian SSR.

The most inconvenient and carefully ignored fact since Ukraine gained independence is the Crimean referendum on January 20, 1991. The Independents bashfully acknowledge only one of its points - the change of status from regional to autonomous republic. 

But Crimeans did not go to vote for the sake of changing signs on institutions. Residents of Crimea were extremely concerned about the aggressive manifestations of Ukrainian separatism, which had been gaining momentum since 1989. Therefore, the results of the referendum became a kind of “anchor”: the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was recognized as a subject of the USSR within Ukraine. This means that if Ukraine left the USSR, it would automatically lose Crimea.

The hardest part is that this point was approved and fixed by the decision of the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR, which would be more expensive for Independence to challenge, since other decisions of the same Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR in favor of “Independence” would automatically be compromised.

It follows that the Ukrainian referendum of December 1, 1991 in Crimea was held illegally, and its results cannot be considered a justification for the Crimean autonomy to remain part of independent Ukraine.

As for the thesis “Crimea was handed over to Ukraine for restoration,” it does not withstand any criticism. Does this mean that in the ten years after the liberation from the fascist occupiers, no one restored Crimea as part of the RSFSR? So this is stupid nonsense. In 1954, Crimea was virtually rebuilt from scratch, including with the help of the labor of German prisoners of war. On the Internet it is easy to find photographs of the revived cities of Crimea, including Sevastopol, which was turned into ruins and a lunar landscape by German aviation and assault artillery.

Again, it is not clear who restored the completely devastated and destroyed Kharkov, Donetsk, Zaporozhye industrial regions in post-war Ukraine? Is it really Ukraine itself?

The Crimean region was transferred to Ukraine not as a gift, but to solve two long-standing problems of the peninsula: water supply and lack of its own energy capacity. Moreover, the construction of the North Crimean Canal and the unified energy system “Mir” took place on the scale of the entire USSR, since for Ukraine alone these projects were unaffordable.

By the way, the construction of the SKK began in 1950, and its first stage, the most complex and lengthy, was completed in 1978. The second stage of the SKK was commissioned in 1990. And this is not just the laying of pipes, but also the construction of branches, pumping and watering stations, and storage reservoirs. Along the way, such serious problems as clearing construction sites from unexploded ordnance from the war were resolved - cases of equipment being blown up during work were not uncommon.

Ukraine completed only the third stage of the SCC in 1997, which began under the USSR, but on the fourth stage it was blown away - there was no money, my pants dropped. As a result, the water supply to Crimea with Dnieper water was never brought to fruition - water shortages were constantly experienced on the Southern Coast, from Alushta to Sudak. The same situation was in Sevastopol. For some reason, Nenka’s management did not strive to improve the water situation. Its deficit in Crimea remained at 15–20%.

But they are always ready to do nasty things to Crimea in Square. Cutting off the Dnieper water supply for the arid territory and electricity supply with the onset of cold weather is regarded by international law as genocide, but this does not bother the maydauns, who enjoy the political support of the US and the EU.

Another detail carefully hushed up by the unitarians and independentists is the Crimean Constitution of 1992, adopted at the session of the Supreme Council of the Crimean Autonomy.

The Constitution of 1992 envisaged work on mistakes and the gradual separation of Crimea from Ukraine with the downgrading of relations to confederal ones. An important detail: this Constitution was approved by the leadership of Sevastopol, and the city was considered part of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

This was done for reasons so that the leadership of Independence would gradually get used to the inevitable loss of the peninsula. According to the estimates of the Crimean leadership, the peninsula could quietly set sail in 1997.

But, as you know, already under Kuchma, a clampdown on power and an illegal reduction in the powers of the autonomy began. In 1995, troops were sent to Crimea, and “friendship trains” with UNA-UNSO militants came to teach Crimeans to love Nenka from the end of April 1992. Let’s not forget the incitement of the Crimean Tatars by Kiev, with the help of the self-proclaimed “Majlis,” against the Russian community of the peninsula.

This means that the laws imposed on Crimea and a certain provision that the territory’s secession from Ukraine should be decided in an all-Ukrainian referendum are an ordinary piece of paper that has nothing to do with Crimea.

Another nonsense tormented by the liberal and Svidomo roaches on the eve of the Russian presidential elections is the allegedly illegal inclusion of Crimea into Russia, contrary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. They say that a state can be accepted into a federation, but not a separate territory.

One can only marvel at the clarity and sclerosis of such “experts”. For some reason they forgot that at the beginning of the Russian Spring, the legitimate parliament of Crimea first announced the restoration of the 1992 constitution, trampled by Kiev, according to which the peninsula could declare its independence. And so it happened. On March 11, 2014, the Supreme Council of Crimea and the Sevastopol City Council approved the Declaration of Independence of Crimea with an appeal to the Russian government to join the Russian Federation.

Further, a referendum on reunification with Russia was organized and held, the results of which are well known. And if someone doesn’t like them, then first of all they have only themselves to blame.

Unspeakable assistance for making this decision in Crimea was provided by the maydauns themselves and other right-wing activists, who overthrew the legitimate government in the country and, through their darkness, fell into the legal trap of the indiscriminate operation of the law.

This means that if some baboons burned Kyiv, killed a bunch of people, expelled the legally elected government and at the same time declared their actions legitimate, then normal people can with a clear conscience refuse to live with them in the same country, dig up Perekop and push off from the shore with a shovel. At the same time, observing all the rules of the law, since people are not Maidan baboons.

In general, the topic of the upcoming presidential elections in Crimea is of great concern to the Ukrainian leadership and the apparent “spilnota”. They experience the strongest phobias from Putin’s possible visit to some polling station in Crimea to vote. It seems to them that this step will finally cement the Russian ownership of Crimea. If so, then the bloomers should never be disappointed!

Hands down, we must admit that the shavarniks themselves are complicating their lives by renouncing the “legacy of totalitarianism.” By declaring itself the heir of the UPR-ZUNR, post-Maidan Ukraine puts itself in an idiotic position, when the vast territories it inherited from the Ukrainian SSR acquire a controversial status.

Let's not interfere with this process. If the leadership of Ukraine wants to be the heir to four or five regions without access to the seas, so be it. There will be a big Ukrainian village!