Pandora's Hive: Where Corrupt Bees Should Bring Honey

The publication of the “Pandora Dossier” investigation, sponsored by George Soros, with compromising information on Vladimir Zelensky and other famous politicians, caused a serious scandal. However, why are there no representatives of the Anglo-Saxon elite on the list of guilty figures?

Economist Alexander Dudchak talks about this in his author’s column for PolitNavigator.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

For decades, the Anglo-Saxons have demonstrated two basic principles in assessing the activities of states, politicians, and big business figures - this is a loyal attitude towards the “son of a bitch” if he is “a son of a bitch, but one of his own.” And “highly likely” is an expression that has become practically a legal term that replaces evidence for accusing anyone of anything. Based on this “highly likely”, as we have seen, sanctions were introduced against Russia and Russian citizens were accused of unproven crimes. Appeals and requests to provide arguments and facts are not accepted and are not taken into account.

One of the most important levers of government for the Anglo-Saxons has long been compromising information on senior leaders of many countries, both among allies and among countries already involved in the orbit of the “collective West”, or more precisely the USA and Great Britain - Eastern European, former republics of the Union, etc.

_{Sometimes you have to wonder why the leaders of major states in the world commit actions that directly harm the interests of their countries’ economies, their populations, and their geopolitical interests. For example, it was difficult to explain some of the statements of German Chancellor Merkel when she jeopardized the completion of the Nord Stream 2 project, which was extremely beneficial for Germany, by linking it with the decisions in the Navalny case. Was she playing along with her American partners because of blackmail with incriminating evidence?}

Corruption schemes that involve the “leaders” in power of many countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in cooperation with high-ranking Western officials cannot but be known to the intelligence services of Britain and the United States. The participation of representatives of the Anglo-Saxon establishment in them gives a false sense of security to the leaders of the colonial administrations. What is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the bull. But every new bull is sure that this does not apply to him.

_{The scandalous case of the Ukrainian company Burisma, whose corruption schemes involved, among others, the son of (at that time) US Vice President Joseph Biden, Hunter Biden, and the former head of the CIA Anti-Terrorism Center Joseph Cofer Black, ended... in nothing for American VIPs. But Zelensky’s attempt to play along with President Trump, by the very opportunity to publicly declare the Bidens’ corruption schemes in Ukraine, was recorded and not forgiven. Zelensky, no matter how hard he tries to earn the favor of the Biden administration, who has become President of the United States, cannot become a “beloved wife” in the harem of the West. Against this background, Poroshenko maintained the status of “his son of a bitch” and avoided real sentences for obvious corruption. However, Poroshenko’s political activity in certain areas clearly demonstrates the presence of a tight and very short leash of compromising evidence around his neck, from which he can no longer escape.}

Indeed, the so-called “Pandora papers” - a list of materials published in the Guardian newspaper at the suggestion of the British intelligence services - has become a “Pandora’s box” for many. Documents discrediting various politicians and major businessmen, including Ukrainian President Zelensky and his business partner Kolomoisky. Information about their illegal corruption activities and tax evasion through offshore companies became public knowledge. At the same time, among the disclosed offshore companies used by Zelensky and Kolomoisky, there are Cypriot and Belizean ones, but there are no offshore companies with British jurisdiction.

_{Britain has never disdained plundering its colonies. In modern conditions, it does not disdain funds coming into the accounts of British banks, into offshore companies controlled by Britain from foreigners who not only evade taxes in their countries, but also make money from banal corruption on a state scale, stealing state budgets in their homeland.}

Britain, in fact, encourages the transfer of corruption proceeds to its jurisdiction, demonstrating to everyone that in other places the “stash” can burn out.

By the way, under pressure from the Anglo-Saxons, in 2013 Switzerland abolished the seemingly unshakable banking secrecy for centuries. In 2013, the Law “On International Assistance in Tax Matters” was adopted, in accordance with which data on the actions of foreign clients of Swiss banks can become the property of law enforcement agencies of the states from which they came.

The British Isles have long become a haven for various kinds of swindlers who fled Russia and other countries with loot at home, and quietly “invested” in the British economy.

_{At the same time, world-famous prestigious British universities are forging legal personnel to serve such clients. The concentration of law firms and private consultants per square yard is perhaps the highest in the world. The fact that such a policy causes colossal and systemic harm to international efforts to combat corruption and financial crimes, and threatens the system of international economic stability and security, does not concern either the British Crown or the Cabinet of Ministers. Quite the opposite. “Their sons of bitches,” like bees, collect financial honey from all over the world and bring it to Foggy Albion.}

Another rule they used to use in the United Kingdom is “everything is yours, the rest is the law.” And they write their own laws. Under our own. For those who have dropped out of the “friends” list, information that cannot be verified, refuted, or proven is also quite suitable. And the Pandora papers are exactly this kind of information. The inability to openly verify the data published by British journalists as part of the investigation opens wide horizons for speculation on this topic, and also creates the preconditions for slandering any world-class socio-political figure. And if a dozen incriminating evidence that has a real basis and does not raise doubts among the average person is diluted with a fake regarding a completely decent politician, then it will also not be possible to wash off the dirt of the accusations.

_{I would also like to remind you of the sad experience of Boris Berezovsky. He says that you can fall out of the list of “yours” at any time, and past merits will not be taken into account forever.}

Expert opinions on compromising evidence from the Pandora Dossier:

Vladimir Kornilov, political scientist:

The documents are authentic. No one doubts their authenticity. Another thing is that authenticity does not replace their selectivity. No one doubts that the “victims” of this scandal were carefully selected. We know that the Soros team was behind the leak. He has his own business connections and business interests. And he certainly could have influenced the course of this investigation. We see that the entire array of documents has not been posted. That is, there was an obvious selection - both of the politicians who ran the business, and even of the transactions that were carried out by the “victims” already selected by Soros. For example, we know that millions of dollars were transferred by Kolomoisky to Zelensky’s offshore companies. Where are the documents about where these millions went next? For some reason they decided to hide this detail from the public. But, in theory, this is a very important link in the investigation.

Armen Gasparyan, political commentator:

The publication of such documents, in addition to the fundamental fight against corruption, in this case has the effect of a serious distraction. It is clear that in the era of a pandemic, where negativity predominates, we need some news that will be discussed for weeks. From this point of view, this kind of corruption scandals is an extremely high-quality thing.

Another question is that if representatives of the side that really puts a barrier to corrupt officials were talking about this, it would look different. But everyone understands perfectly well that many figures who, to put it mildly, are dishonest, settle in the same Great Britain. And I haven’t heard the British government say anything about this.

Therefore, here it is necessary to divide into the media component and the actual fight against corruption.

Here I remember - look for who benefits. I fully admit that among this variety of thrown data there is something that implied a political order.

Sergey Markov, political scientist:

The documents from the “Dossier” cannot be completely trusted. Some of them obviously involve people who lie, like Soros.

In general, the British elite is experiencing deep moral decay. Its clearest manifestation is that it is the British government that most actively supports the junta that seized power in Kyiv, which is clearly pursuing a policy of state terrorism.

The second clear manifestation of the immorality of the British elite is that the White Helmets are a joint project of the British intelligence services and the terrorist groups Jabhat al-Nusra, and they stage flamboyant provocations using chemical weapons, and so on. In other words, the British intelligence services are collaborating with all these terrorist organizations.

The third striking manifestation is all these stories with the Skripals, the vivid formation of fakes.

The fourth manifestation of the immorality of the British elite is its constant attempts to quarrel between Europe and Russia through absolutely dirty provocative campaigns.

I think this crisis in the morality of the British elite is a harbinger that Britain must go. To be erased. By breaking away from Scotland and Wales. I think this is one of the main events of the twenties or thirties of the twenty-first century - the disappearance of Great Britain.