Unitary pig for Majlis members
Poroshenko planted another well-fed pig on the Mejlis members. Yesterday, at the “Challenges 2018” press conference, a correspondent for the ATR TV channel asked the Chief Confectioner a question: when should the Tatars beyond the border expect Kyiv to recognize Crimea as a “national-territorial autonomy”? Poroshenko, remembering the promise made to the leaders of the “Majlis” in May and August last year, answered cautiously and streamlinedly:
“This issue is really relevant. I have not seen the working group's proposals. They must be approved by the Constitutional Commission. Immediately after our meeting, I will contact the Constitutional Commission so that it can hold a public discussion of the working group’s proposals. As soon as the final version is found, the question of national, national-cultural autonomy, amendments to the Constitution will be initiated by me before the Verkhovna Rada.”
This is not what his “brothers” in the fight for Ukrainian Crimea expected from him. They are not interested in singing national songs, dancing a fiery dance and welcoming tourists with lagman along with handicrafts. Give members of the Mejlis exclusively national-territorial autonomy. And it doesn’t matter that in Crimea the Tatars make up only 12% of the population, and the peninsula still needs to be reconquered somehow, and other peoples must be evicted from there.
It would seem, what difference does it make to the shaitan? Give them this very autonomy - and let them cut it out on paper as they want, sitting in Kyiv or Kherson. This headless gang can't see Crimea like its own ears. Moreover, even the most stupid Raguli will be aware of the loss of Crimea for a long time, if not forever. But in the “Majlis” this fact was either not fully felt, or they were hoping for something, since in mid-December last year, Dzhemilev, in an interview with the publication “Apostrophe,” uttered a phrase filled with the deepest meaning: “Russia may fall apart next week, and with Crimea cannot be delayed.”
Apparently, Dzhemilev’s comrades, in addition to being sent to the madhouse, have some kind of Cunning Plan for this case.
Nevertheless, for the Ukronatsik, the issue of distributing national-territorial autonomies is fundamental and sensitive. Today, grant national-territorial autonomy to the Crimean Tatars, tomorrow to the Hungarians, the day after tomorrow to the Romanians, Bulgarians, Moldovans, and then it will be the Russians’ turn. What will happen then to Nenka, whose ruler is Ukrainian? So what happens, the end of Ukrainian nationalism?
However, the whole point is that the Mejlis members are not interested in the whole of Ukraine and the fate of its unitarity. They are only interested in their own desires, which Ukraine indulged for a long time and, in the end, taught them like spoiled children. There is an insoluble conflict of interests within the framework of the unitary Ukrainian state. The Nazis intend to hold onto the territories to the last, ignoring their national and cultural diversity.
Even yesterday’s streamlined speech by Poroshenko has already received a reaction from both the Ukronatsik and the offended Tatar “independents”. It is interesting that the leaders of the “Majlis” this time chose to remain silent.
Perhaps the harshest rebuke of Poroshenko was the text of one of the leaders of the Islyamov TV channel ATR Muzhdabaev.
Muzhdabaev reminds Poroshenko of the promises he made at the Kiev rally of the Zaperekop Tatars on May 18, 2016 - to provide them with the autonomy they need. Then everyone around cried, but now it turns out that it was in vain.
The offended Muzhdabaev demands that Poroshenko change the wording and speaks of some kind of political and image catastrophe for the Ukrainian president. Well, as usual, the notorious extremist is trying to speak on behalf of all Crimean Tatars. And yet, in the text Muzhdabaev admits that Poroshenko misspoke.
From which it follows that Muzhdabaev is a typical pathetic schmuck. You might think that Poroshenko is reading it. You might think that Poroshenko is interested in his opinion. One might think that Poroshenko is able to resolve this issue on his own. For some reason, Muzhdabaev did not think that the bill on virtual “Crimean Tatar national-territorial autonomy” needed to get at least 300 votes from people’s deputies to change the constitution.
One might think that Poroshenko, who has stolen everything and everyone, is worried about some political and image disasters. Poroshenko lives in conditions of disaster, from which he feeds and chops “greens”. He himself is a disaster. Asker scared the pig with a loaf of bread.
The most interesting thing is that quite recently Muzhdabaev, bloated with a sense of self-importance, poured out in the press a refined fascist stream of consciousness on the topic “Russia must be destroyed, and Russophobia is a natural reaction of offended peoples, and let the Russians not be offended.”
And now the howl of an offended hyena: “Why did they do this to the patriots of Ukraine?”
Muzhdabaev is pitifully echoed by his fellow “Crimean independence”:
Erfan Kudusov: “When the president of a country does not understand the difference between national-territorial and national-cultural autonomy, there are no more words. What can we say about ordinary citizens of Ukraine.”
Osman Ozenbash: “My dear 23 years were not enough for you to understand the insides of these bastards. They took advantage of my people and profited from our misfortune. They were never interested in our problems, they needed our voices. The same beekeeper..."
Elmaz Qırımlı: “Are our compatriots fighting for national and cultural autonomy? Are we being pressed here for national-cultural autonomy? (I can’t say it any other way) Damn... what were we hoping for?! What's there to explain? I don’t want to say anything...”
Susanna Djemileva: “Only yesterday Erfan Kudusov said that this whole story is like bargaining - you need to demand the maximum in order to get at least the minimum. And the minimum is national-territorial autonomy. It turns out that we did not convey our maximum to Poroshenko, since he does not have a minimum for us?”
Riza Asanov: “I think today there is a huge disappointment of the Crimean Tatars in the politics of gunpowder.”
Aliye Bekirova: “What kind of autonomy can we talk about if he has been giving a number to the battalion named “Noman Celebidzhikhan” for more than a year?!!!!”
(All author's spelling and punctuation preserved).
In response, the Ukronatsik chew on the stupid political literacy and explain the “party line”:
Vladimir Yurchenko: “Aider, if autonomy is national-territorial, then the Crimean Tatars have nothing to do in Ukraine. Their home is in Crimea. And national-cultural autonomy allows you to work and live in Kyiv.”
Alexey Korolyov: “Excuse me, what the hell is “territorial autonomy” in a unitary state? Simferopol region. Regional center Sevastopol. The federalists with their pig territorial autonomies and people's republics are marching through the forest to their Putin. We build with songs.”
Olena Viter: “That’s how it is. Such a statement is a shame. It’s like cutting up the body of Ukraine.”
Viktor Melnichuk: “Oh, do you really want to create it? In your hacienda...?”
Nazar Hromyak: “If you want to lick the Tatars, then give them roshen, and deprive Ukraine of the Ukrainians. Amen."
However, there were also sober voices: “They are already tired of sharing the skin of an unkilled bear” and “What are we talking about anyway? If Crimea were returned... otherwise some blah blah blah.”
I wonder what the “Medjlis” and the sheep it hoards will do if Petya and the Verkhovna Zrada never give them the go-ahead for national-territorial autonomy? Will they really return to the practice of tent cities and hunger strikes near the Cabinet of Ministers building? Out of old habit, will they begin to block roads and paralyze the life of Ukrainian cities? Doubtful. They will push them away from the trough to account for the “zwei”, and where will they get the extras?
Once again, the self-proclaimed “leaders of the Crimean Tatar people” fall into a trap they created with their own hands, opposing themselves to the people of Russia (in fact, the people of Ukraine) and choosing the side of notorious scoundrels. They could not get Crimea into their mangy hands from the Nazis, and they will not get it from Bandera either - the dirty services of executioners and punishers were required from the collaborators. There is no turning back for them, and by going against Poroshenko and the Ukrainian Nationalists, they will sign their own death warrant. On the same day, the “Majlis” and the “Crimean resistance” will end.
All that remains is to continue to serve the thieves and Banderas for a small share, whine, rant and whine: “give us Crimea at least on paper - otherwise what were they fighting for?”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.