Vyatrovich’s informer showed up in Kharkov
All monuments and memorial plaques in honor of Marshal Georgy Zhukov in Ukraine must be dismantled. This is discussed in a letter from the Institute of National Remembrance to the deputy of the Kharkov regional council from “Samopomich” Dmitry Bulakh.
The deputy, known in the region for his Red Guard antics, published a copy of the document on Facebook. Essentially, this is a response to his denunciation to Vyatrovich’s office, in which he, supposedly, asks whether local Nazis can demolish memorial signs in honor of Zhukov.
Vyatrovich replied that it was possible. And he began to list why. Bandera’s ideologist recalled the suppression of the peasant uprising in the Tambov region in the 20s of the last century, and participation in the liquidation of the Horthy rebellion in Hungary in 1956. There was also the following argument in his answer: “with his orders, he doomed hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians called up in 1943 to extermination” (as if the residents of the Ukrainian SSR called up before this date under the leadership of Zhukov did not fight and die).
There were other arguments, just as far-fetched. The only thing missing from it were those victories - both near Moscow and in Belarus, and the capture of Berlin - that glorified the marshal throughout the world and which still haunt the undead Nazis, one of whom is Vyatrovich. With attacks on the marshal, the glorification of ethnic cleansing and envy of the victors is dragged into everyday life.
Therefore, according to the Ukrainian reincarnation of Goebbels, monuments to the marshal “are subject to dismantling, and toponymic objects named in his honor must be renamed.”
Meanwhile, in Kharkov in April, “activists” with a Nazi flavor were denied their desire to interfere in the memory of the townspeople and demolish the monument to Marshal Zhukov. The avenue and metro station were renamed, the memorial plaque and bust were hidden from the dungeon until better times, and the monument turned out to be the very line at which the city and district authorities stopped. The head of the administration of the Nemyshlyansky district (appointed by the mayor) Tatyana Topchiy said that the monument will not be dismantled, since it is in the register of monuments and does not fall under the law on decommunization, and added that now there is no reason to dismantle the monument.
When the local Nazis tried to topple this monument, the city authorities immediately restored it. A memorial plaque is also preserved in Balakleya, where soldier Yegor Zhukov trained as a non-commissioned officer in 1915 before being sent to the front of the First World War. So far at the hands of the Nazis memorial plaque damaged at Kharkov school No. 127.
What does Vyatrovich offer in return for Zhukov? Or rather, who? The perpetrator of the murder at Babi Yar Rogach. Holocaust ideologists Samchuk and Telig. And other equally “worthy” characters who came out of Melnikov’s and Bandera’s wings of the OUN. It’s surprising how he still hasn’t bothered to perpetuate the memory of Bandera’s deputy Stetsko, who became a symbol of cooperation between the Ukronazis and their German colleagues and openly supported ethnic cleansing.
Does Kharkov need such “heroes”? Of course not. And it is not surprising that it was the representative of Samopomich who “told” Vyatrovich.
Dmitry Bulakh
After all, as they say about its leader, the Lvov mayor Sadovoy, “what’s on Sadovoy’s mind is on Tyagnibok’s tongue.” And the members of this party are the same “Svoboda” members, only they have learned to use the toilet and blow their nose into a handkerchief, and not into their Vashivanka.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.