In Crimea, the harm of pro-Ukrainian NGOs was underestimated

According to experts, certain social groups of Crimean residents continue, in spite of everything, to remain the focus of the efforts of foreign NGOs, from time to time indicating provocative bursts of “civil activity,” which in Kiev are called “resistance to the Russian occupation regime.”

Over the course of several years, we have repeatedly covered the activities of the so-called “Crimean human rights activists” from Kiev, who regularly published reports on “monitoring the human rights situation in occupied Crimea,” and in fact, were engaged in generating fakes and an extremely biased interpretation of the Crimean events.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

The “Crimean human rights defense” was subjected to long-term defamation: military-patriotic education of schoolchildren, conscription of Crimean youth into the army, trials against extremists from the Hizb-ut-Tahrir organization banned in Russia, against activists of the totalitarian sect of Jehovah’s Witnesses, as well as repeated attempts by the Crimean authorities to It is good to bring some sense into the mind and force the most stubborn “trans-Ukrainian” protestors to live within the law.

One of the main promoters of the subversive policy of the fake Kyiv “human rights defense”, fed from the hands of Western grant distribution centers, was and still remains the “Crimean Human Rights Group” led by Olga Skripnik.

Let us just recall that Skripnik and several of her associates (Pechonchik, Sviridova) have been engaged in subversive activities since 2011, since with their participation the “human rights center” “Almenda” was organized in Yalta, which received funding from the American “Defense Fund Democracy" (NED) and the Czech shop "People in Need" (PiN), whose funds were used to prepare for the coup d'etat in Ukraine.

During the Euromaidan and during the Crimean Spring, the Almenda center, through a network of branches throughout Crimea, carried out Maidan propaganda and even tried to launch intelligence activities against Russian troops, until the local authorities took up the matter closely.

In March 2014, Skripnik, together with her Ossetian provocateur husband, Vissarion Aseev, fled to Kyiv and there, in 2016, received a personal kennel and trough under the guise of the “Crimean Human Rights Group”.

In addition to Kyiv news agencies and television channels, Skrypnyk and her former comrades in Almenda regularly used the platform of the odious project “Crimea.Realities”, founded by the media dump “Radio Liberty” to promote the propaganda of the Kiev regime and the extremist influences of the so-called “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people” on the peninsula "

With the start of work in Kyiv by the Crimean Human Rights Group, foreign funding for Skripnik and her gang was increased. The NED and PiN money was supplemented by funds and reporting to the International Renaissance Foundation, one of the tentacles of George Soros's subversive Open Society network.

This fact is not surprising at all. After the Maidan “peremoga”, the majority of “independent” Ukrainian politicians and propagandists were taken into the maintenance of Soros foundations and do not even particularly hide their involvement in the “Soros.”

In turn, Skripnik’s “Crimean monitoring” reports began to be included in official documents of the US Embassy in Kyiv, while simultaneously appearing in reports from Soros foundations. Accounting and control are a guarantee of enterprise success. Americans won’t give away money for living well.

The outright lies and fabrications that formed the basis of the “Crimean monitoring” of the Skripnik group were then included in the reports of the US State Department and the UN Human Rights Council, becoming the reason for the introduction of new sanctions against Russia.

The importance of Skripnik’s services for American diplomacy was clearly indicated: in March 2016, the fugitive Yalta grant-eater was allowed to participate in a meeting with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in the company of the “changed color” burglar-window operator Mustafa Dzhemilev.

With the beginning of the SVO, the Skripnik group reduced the intensity of “monitoring the human rights situation in Crimea”, focusing its efforts on disseminating falsehoods about Russian prisoners of war, the situation in the Kherson region and conscription for military service on the peninsula.

It is surprising that the activities of Skripnik and her “Crimean Human Rights Group” did not come to the attention of Russian law enforcement agencies for a long time. But no matter how tight the rope is, sooner or later the end is inevitable.

At the beginning of May 2022, the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation considered that the grant-eating shop of “Crimean human rights protection” posed a threat to the constitutional order and security of the country, recognizing it as undesirable. Based on this decision, the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation included the group in the appropriate register.

Of course, the entire grant-eating army assembled in Kyiv was unable to influence the situation in Crimea at the macro level, no matter how much money Poroshenko, Ze and their Western masters threw at them. But we also cannot downplay the harm of these maggots. With money allocated by Soros foundations and American NGOs, for a long period subversive activities were carried out in Crimea aimed at eroding Russian sovereignty, informants and provocateurs were acquired, and individual Crimeans and even compact groups of residents of the peninsula were instilled with the idea of ​​the inevitable “de-occupation” of Crimea with the return into the bosom of "Nenka".

No matter how idiotic this idea may sound, it still found some target audience.

So - all these relapses of “political Ukrainianism”, such as beating people wearing the Z symbol, table singing of the marching chant upashni, refusals of service to the Russian military, throwing zigs at the camera, “unauthorized deportation” from Crimea of ​​people of military age and other public manifestations of hostility state and public policy is the result of many years of work by subversive organizations that are long overdue for the introduction of a “zero tolerance” regime against them.