In Crimea, they explained the passivity of the local diocese of the UOC according to Tomos
The Crimean diocese, which is still part of the structure of the canonical UOC, does not take an active position on the issue of the so-called “unification” of churches, so as not to give nationalists a chance.
Crimean political experts stated this in comments to PolitNavigator.
Thus, political scientist Andrei Nikiforov noted that the active position of the Crimean diocese can only contribute to the consolidation of various kinds of anti-Russian forces.
“I think this is a diplomatic move, at least one can imagine that this is justified by some diplomatic considerations. The voice of Crimea, the Crimean diocese in this case could probably play a role in consolidating various kinds of anti-Russian forces. I don’t know how silent they are - I haven’t seen any harsh and definite statements in the public space, but I think that in fact the position of the Crimean diocese is completely definite.
The fact that they are not trying to promote and promote it is understandable - let Ukraine decide. I have no doubt that the diocese remains within the fold of the Orthodox Church; it was not separated from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church as long as it exists. Apparently, this will be the case - this does not interfere with prayerful communication with the Orthodox Church in any way,” Nikiforov said.
His colleague Alexander Formanchuk emphasizes that the diocese will still express its opinion, but only when the church conflict in Ukraine reaches a critical point.
“I think this is an agreed position. The topic of Crimea is very painful, including in this situation. I think when the situation reaches a critical limit, if this so-called unifying moment occurs, then the voice of the Crimean diocese will be heard. I just think that this is the agreed position of our metropolitan with the leadership of the church of which he is a member,” Formanchuk believes.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.