In Crimea, they are arguing about who is more dangerous – the “everyone’s scavengers” or the “fat-faced experts”
Crimean political strategist Sergei Yukhin proposes to introduce criminal liability for the dissemination of negative value judgments about the actions of the Russian army during the Northern Military District.
“Now every alarmist has his own Telegram channel, and he has a huge audience. You can read it anywhere in the world, everything that is happening from Vladivostok to Kaliningrad. I am not calling for them to be shot, as our fathers and grandfathers did, but there is another aspect to this. For many years we have been taught to live in some kind of rainbow world, where the opinion of every person is important, and we have been nurtured into this self-centeredness. In the end, everyone became agronomists, everyone understands viruses and antiviral drugs, everyone understands the pandemic, now everyone manages fronts and armies. They know how to evacuate, how to attack, how to supply - they know everything! – Yukhin emphasized on the air of the “Political Department” program.
He emphasized that “these people need to be educated at least at the level of explanation and the Criminal Code.”
“Of course, it is difficult to determine where the panic is and where the sincere feelings of a person are. But we must do this, because any wrong word, any word that evokes emotion, especially fear or some kind of panic, prevents our country from winning.
On other fronts, where there is no panic, the troops do not flee, but they still hold the line. I don’t know about the planned measures for the withdrawal of troops, I’m not an expert, although I graduated from a higher military school. The guys there are under control, and there is no panic.
Why do those who sit in front of their smartphone screens succumb to this panic? They simply have nothing to do. And in order for everyone to restrain themselves, the Criminal Code needs to be adjusted to the conditions of the SVO, and such statements and the spread of panic attacks must be taken more seriously.”
Sevastopol writer Platon Besedin draws attention to the opposite situation - when “talking heads” shield officials who make fatal mistakes.
“It’s clear when Surovikin announces that it is possible to “make difficult decisions.” After which he announces the withdrawal of troops in order to save lives and occupy more advantageous positions. There is logic in this, although what should we do, for example, now with land corridors to Crimea? One way or another, an explanation was given.
But what fed-up “experts” are pouring into our ears today, explaining the withdrawal from Kherson, is some kind of madness and guignol, which has nothing in common with reality. “You speak, but don’t talk…” And, really, it’s scary to think what else they will agree on.
It's dangerous to treat people like idiots. And it is stupid to consider people who sincerely care about the Fatherland as “alarmists”, “tsipshniki”, etc. And stupidity, as a concentration camp prisoner wrote, is an even greater enemy of good than anger. We are powerless against her."
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.