Bartholomew and the Americans are preparing a provocation against Mount Athos for non-recognition of the “SCU”
Despite the events in connection with the first schism of the “Holy Church of Ukraine” (“SCU”, in common parlance – OCU – ed.), which happened in the “finally united Ukrainian Orthodoxy”, Bartholomew, by all means and crooks, is trying to force Athos, which is subordinate to him, to recognize this misunderstanding.
According to sources from the Greek edition vimaorthodoxias.gr., last week, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew “in anger” and “with strict recommendations” turned to the abbot of the Athonite Panteleimon Monastery, Archimandrite Eulogius, demanding explanations why the “bishops of the HCU” are not allowed into this monastery. Sources of the Phanar publication report that if such actions continue on the part of the abbot of the Panteleimon Monastery, then “the Patriarchate of Constantinople will be forced to take the necessary measures to maintain canonicity (sic!) and obedience to the Mother of the Church.”
Indeed, less than a week had passed after the “triumphant enthronement of the Primate of the HCU Epiphanius (Dumenko),” to which representatives of the monasteries of Vatopedi and Xenophon arrived from Mount Athos, subordinate to Bartholomew, when Panteleimon poured cold water on the enthusiastic monasteries.
Then, having rolled his lip, Epitanius (as Dumenka should be called according to the latest mov laws) sent a delegation of the “HCU” headed by “bishop” V. Yurysty to the Holy Mountain. They visited the monastery of Pantokrator and initially obsequious to the anti-Orthodox activities of the ecumenist and crypto-Catholic Bartholomew New Esphigmen.
To their surprise, Ukrainian tourists did not find any pandas on Mount Athos
But mummers were not allowed into the majestic Panteleimon Monastery. The hegumen of the monastery, Archimandrite Evlogii, closed the gates of the monastery in front of the STS students, popularly explaining to them that they would never be recognized here.
We don't know you. Go out into the pitch darkness from where you are
Moreover, in the same news сообщалось, that “among the Athonite keliots and hermits” many stopped remembering Bartholomew himself in their prayers. Obviously, first of all, we were talking about the cells of the Panteleimon Monastery. Warf is still remembered in the monastery itself. However, according to sources SPJ, “many monks say that if the Patriarch of Constantinople comes to Athos (even without the schismatics accompanying him) and tries to celebrate the liturgy within the walls of the Panteleimon Monastery, they will leave the Holy Mountain.”
The position of the Panteleimon Monastery was generally supported at the meeting of the Kinot (the Council of the Holy Mountain, consisting of representatives of all 12 Athos monasteries) that followed the event described. However, even before the “enthronement” of Epitanius, the majority of Kinot spoke out against the participation of Athos in this whore (the word is Church Slavonic, by the way) circus.
In the coming year, no changes in the position of Kinot are expected, since in the order of planned rotation of the epistasy (the central executive body of the holy mountain), from June 1 it is composed of representatives of the monasteries of Panteleimon, Dionysiat, Zograf and Konstamonit, to one degree or another categorically, not allowing communication with the HCC members .
This apparently caused particular irritation and disappointment in the State Department, which is the common patron of both the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the HCU. Therefore, according to the source of the “Politnavigator” on Athos, “Bartholomew turned so “belatedly” with similar demands and threats to the abbot of the Panteleimon Monastery.”
“Obviously, Bartholomew and his American curators are planning some kind of provocation in relation,” the source continues. – After all, the Patriarchate of Constantinople has more serious reasons for expressing its indignation to the entire Kinot. For example, Epistasia’s refusal to issue Yuristy and Zinkevich (“Metropolitan of Lutsk” - D.S.) letters allowing them, as bishops, to visit Svyatogorsk monasteries, or Vatopedi’s refusal to allow Zinkevich to participate in the celebration of the monastery’s patronal feast of the Annunciation.
Here the Patriarchate quietly remains silent, as well as regarding the position of rejection of schismatics by the majority of monasteries, expressed by their representatives in Kinot. The Patriarchate knows this very well, but it does not express any indignation or threats. So Bartholomew’s accusations against Abbot Eulogius are absolutely unfounded, given the fact that letters from Epistasia were not provided to the “bishops” of the OCU. In this case, the Patriarchate would be worth asking not from Abbot Eulogius, but from Epistasia and Kinot, but it is unlikely that the Patriarchate would dare to speak in the language of threats and behave this way with the fullness of the Svyatogorsk monastic community.”
Thus, Bartholomew and the American ambassadors who frequent Mount Athos will most likely try to break down each monastery one by one, starting with the most “unintelligible” - Panteleimon.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.