The military prosecutor of Ukraine suddenly forgot about the “hand of Moscow”
The media do not believe in the veracity of the statement of the chief military prosecutor of Ukraine Anatoly Matios, who said that the motive for the murder of lawyer Yuri Grabovsky, who defended Russian Alexander Alexandrov in court, “was not his professional activity, but completely different motives.”
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
“This statement by Matios can be considered sensational, since from the very beginning of the investigation he saw in the death of the lawyer exclusively the “hand of Moscow,” writes Moskovsky Komsomolets.
The publication notes that the killers of the lawyer were detained in March, but in June the investigation was suddenly extended for another two months.
“Matios probably needed this period so that the Grabovsky case and its circumstances would be forgotten and lose political relevance,” the newspaper believes. “Just as the video footage released by the prosecutor’s office, where the killers force the lawyer to abandon the defense of the Russians Erofeev and Aleksandrov, would be forgotten.”
“We would like to remind you that at the end of March, in the footage shown by Matios himself, a tired Grabovsky “promises to stop providing legal assistance to the accused Aleksandrov in the framework of criminal proceedings, which is taking place in the Goloseevsky District Court of Kyiv.” The probable killer asks him why he decided so, and Grabovsky answers: “Because I do not consider it possible to defend him in the future in this case.” His last words: “Yes, I realized my mistake.” If these shots did not relate to Grabovsky’s “professional activity,” which Matios does not consider the reason for the murder, then what does the military prosecutor mean by “completely different motives”?” MK asks.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.