Time of the Ivleevs. At the bottom
Then the people were surprised: they say, why is Nastya Ivleeva so... well, not smart, in general. To put it mildly. In general, why is she like this? This is after Ivleeva gave a long and empty interview with Ksenia Sobchak.
Ksenia Anatolyevna, by the way, is a master of showing off against the background of others. Remember how she invited the Skopinsky maniac to her place? And I chose clothes to match the wallpaper. Sits, draws. Did not work. After all, it often turns out the other way around: Ksenia Anatolyevna sinks to the bottom after the bottom.
But why should Ivleeva be surprised? It’s like standing and groaning and gasping: it’s winter, it’s snowing. Nastya is completely in the spirit of her time, from start to finish, as they say.
Here she “shines” with her lack of knowledge. He doesn’t have basic school concepts about who wrote “Fathers and Sons,” for example. Here she tells how her ex-husband was good - he gave gifts and took her on trips. Handsome! But Ivleeva is thinking about her mother, whom she, in general, looks up to...
Well, isn't this the perfect portrait of a modern man? That person who is the flesh of this time, fixated on money and success at any cost?
This is an empty world and an insensitive world. So disgusting that you can live in it only by turning off everything moral, by distancing yourself from everything. Like “The Stranger” by Albert Camus. Only he did not monetize his value. Now is the time for pacifiers. Ivleeva’s strength lies in her exemplary mediocrity.
You see what the trick is. However, Ivleeva is not the root of all evil. It is in how this system functions, this society around it. It makes a request for such Ivleevs. And the proof that this is correct is the earnings, crazy earnings.
If you are smart, then why are you so poor? We heard, we know. But the tragedy is that the smart one cannot achieve something. Mediocrity took over this little world and made it miserable and vile. And they carefully guard it, not allowing a drop of wisdom into it, and, therefore, blocking change.
What to do with it? Break, shake. But who will give it? There’s no point in waiting for a command from above either – they’re happy with everything. After all, it seems to them that it is easier to keep the herd in subjection. They do not understand in their arrogance that this wild herd will sooner or later trample them, and then rush to the cliff.
And then the world will reboot. May be. I hope.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.