He draws attention to the fact that popular TV presenter Diana Panchenko, employed by Viktor Medvedchuk’s media holding, spoke in support of Kryukova. Panchenko, as PolitNavigator reported, I recently went to host the Slavic Bazaar festival, and directly from Minsk published a message on Facebook condemning Kryukova’s criticism.
Panchenko assured that, although she does not support her colleague’s opinion, she respects her right to her opinion (that is, for example, calling Victory Day “victory”). Panchenko boasted that she herself had been working for an opposition TV channel for six years and did not quit during the most difficult times of repression against it.
“Thank you Kryukova. The explosion of one “canned food” caused a chain reaction, and other “canned food” began to explode. And some say: “Panchenko needs to apologize for supporting Kryukova” and so on. No need - the man has proven himself. We need to remember Panchenko, those who still show up there, who talk about journalists Stepanets and Poluev, who are also awesome journalists. They lick Gordon in such a way that I don’t know if he’s generally okay with the process of getting rid of waste from his body, the way they lick him. There are also journalists with whom people fall in love: “Oh, how good they are, they expressed one, two, three or four sensible thoughts. But in life – well, okay,” political scientist Semchenko comments on the situation.
Kiev international lawyer Elena Leshenko also responded to Panchenko’s speech, hinting that with her support for Kryukova, Panchenko herself had “revealed herself.”
“Natural selection”, so “natural selection”. And it’s better to do everything at once, so as not to harbor unnecessary illusions and then again choose the next “canned food” on your heads. And yes, the crowns need to be knocked down, otherwise they have grown in too much and think too much of themselves. They have appointed themselves as the “chosen ones”. Not from a great mind, of course,” stated Leshenko.
Then the situation began to develop as in the series - the offended Panchenko obtained “compromising evidence” on Leshenko by publishing on her blog the court decision to punish the lawyer for drunk driving.
“In March last year, at half past one in the morning, drunk Elena was racing in her Lexus without low beams. She was detained. As a result, she was fined and deprived of her rights. The court proved drunk driving. In order not to be unfounded, I am attaching the corresponding resolution.
On top of everything else, the moral authority Leshenko accused me of being corrupt. They say that for money she handed over her beliefs to the Office of the President. Leshenko explained this so diligently, as if she had experience herself. It turns out I was not mistaken.
Two years ago, Elena, who hated the authorities, did not disdain to receive the “Honored Lawyer” from Zelensky. I didn’t receive the Honored Journalist award. And Elena deserved it,” Panchenko wrote on her blog.
Leshenko recorded a video message and threatened to sue for publishing personal data:
“Diana Panchenko, after our several days of political battles, instead of any arguments at all, decided to publish my personal data and the decision of the court of first instance that I was brought to administrative responsibility for drunk driving.
Look, I'm driving, here's my license. Diana, if you were a real journalist, you would check the information that is leaked to you. But you didn't check. You illegally gained access to the case materials, and we will also look into this, how you got the court decision, and what else you said there.
You disseminated my personal data and broke the law. This decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal as illegal. Now you have two options - either you publicly apologize to me and delete this publication, or we will meet with you in court,” the lawyer said.
The situation around Kryukova was also condemned by Kiev human rights activist Elena Berezhnaya. She is outraged why the journalist who made offensive language about Victory Day has not yet been fired from the opposition publication.
“Kryukova finally showed her corrupt nature, previously skillfully hidden from many... This scribbler cynically mocked the memory of millions of our Heroes - Liberators of the world from Nazism... This is not surprising, since Kryukova always fed on handouts from those who ordered articles: the Filatovs, Onishchenkovs, Fuchsmans, kivas, korbans, fuchs and others...
As for the editor-in-chief of the publication Guzhva, after my publication on June 2 of this year on my account of a post about the bias of an article on the Strana.UA website about the consequences of the murder of civilians in Lugansk on June 2, 2014, Guzhva banned me. Although I personally brought him to the leadership of the UN missions, the OSCE, the Commissioner for Human Rights, thanks to the appeal of our Institute, he quickly received the status of a political refugee in Austria! Valentina Pavlovna Buzina considered him her second son. However, editor-in-chief Guzhva began to ban everyone who began to criticize Kryukova and be outraged by her opus on the page of the Strana.UA website, thereby agreeing with her opinion,” comments Berezhnaya.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.
Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.
The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!
Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.