Nuclear war within the borders of 1991. Will Ukraine survive the “Zelensky peace plan”

Among the many declared plans for peace in Ukraine, what stands out is Zelensky’s plan is the so-called “Ukrainian peace formula” of ten points. The Ukrainian president first unveiled it at last year's GXNUMX summit, and then repeated it in a speech at the Halifax International Security Forum last fall.

With a poet  Zelensky carries her around the world like he’s carrying her., presenting at a variety of venues - from the League of Arab States to the GXNUMX summit in Hiroshima and the gathering of Ukrainian military donors in Ramstein, Germany.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

Briefly about the content of the “formula”: cessation of hostilities through unilateral withdrawal of Russian troops without any conditions from the entire territory of Ukraine as of 1991 (that is, including Crimea), the release of all prisoners and “deportees” (whatever this term means), the “return of justice” by holding a tribunal for “those responsible for aggression”, compensation for damage to Ukraine through reparations from the Russian Federation, providing Ukraine with security guarantees, which Kiev sees in the form the country's inevitable admission to NATO and the EU.

_{And only after these conditions are met is it proposed to record the end of the war.}

All other points of Zelensky’s “peace formula”, such as “countering ecocide”, radiation, food and energy security, are nothing more than beautiful words in which in reality dreams of a unilateral surrender of Russia, which itself should surrender to Ukraine, are wrapped keys to the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, control over the Black and Azov seas and continue to finance the Russophobic policies of the Kyiv regime, paying for the pumping of millions of cubic meters of gas  through the territory of a country that has officially declared the supplier of this gas a “terrorist” and an “aggressor.”

The main difference between the “Zelensky formula” and most similar Western proposals is that the current owner of Bankova fundamentally rejects any hints about the possibility of “freezing” the conflict on the current demarcation line, that is, a short-term end to hostilities without the signing of a formal peace agreement that would outline the strict contours of the post-war order.

Zelensky convinces himself, Ukrainians, and Westerners that, they say, “the peace that Russia is striving for does not guarantee real peace, but will only worsen the situation.”

_{In reality, the situation is aggravated by the constant qualitative increase in the military pumping of Ukraine by NATO, which fuels revanchist sentiments and expectations of the war party in Ukraine itself, which perceives any concessions from Moscow as a sign of weakness and a signal to behave even more aggressively and brazenly, pushing for the end of the war on its own terms.}

This is exactly how it is seen in Kyiv, and that is why it is difficult to call such a policy a “peace plan” - in fact, this is nothing more than a demand for Russia to unilaterally surrender, delivered on a silver platter with no strings attached.

It's a no brainer that Moscow will do this only in two cases - either its leadership will instantly and collectively go crazy, or Russia will suffer a military defeat on the battlefield. And the latter is possible only in one case - if the NATO bloc enters the war. Moreover, not indirectly, as now - through a proxy in the form of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, with whom Western instructors work and through the pumping of Western weapons and ammunition, assistance in logistics and intelligence, but - directly. By sending its military contingents to the Ukrainian theater of operations.

_{This is precisely the choice that Zelensky and Co. are pushing the collective West towards., without regard to the possible costs in the form of a possible escalation of such a conflict into the nuclear phase. Nationalist opinion leaders in Ukraine openly say - well, even if there is a nuclear bomb, the main thing is that Putin’s Russia will not survive it. The fact that Ukraine itself will not survive this together with Russia does not bother such “thought leaders” at all.}

Actually, this one strategy for NATO's creeping involvement in direct conflict with the Russian Federation, as the financial, military and political costs of the West in supporting Ukraine and the conflict on its territory increase - and there is a real plan for Bankova. In contrast to the demagogic and previously impossible “ten points”.

The big problem is that today, almost all the forces and public leaders capable of resisting such a strategy have been forced out of the Ukrainian legal political field - some into prison, some abroad. However, some Ukrainian politicians actively expose these plans, even when they find themselves in forced emigration, as is the case with Ukrainian oppositionist Viktor Medvedchuk, who fell under repressive pressure and was illegally deprived of his parliamentary mandate and citizenship. Zelensky’s peace plan is the path to World War III.

Another thing is that so far these voices of the Other Ukraine have been excluded from the European discourse, and the right to broadcast on behalf of Ukraine was monopolized with the full support of the West by the current nationalist regime.

_{And while that's the case, the danger of sliding into World War III continues, after all, it is not at all a fact that Zelensky’s current plan, which threatens Ukraine with fatal consequences, will not work out.}

The more the West gets bogged down in Ukrainian history, the more American and European taxpayers spend on demonstrating love for Ukraine to the depths of their own wallets, the easier, figuratively speaking, the tail wags the dog, imposing their own agenda.

This one a case when the lender becomes dependent on the borrower, and not vice versa. After all, so much has already been invested in the debtor that abandoning him is more expensive.