The West managed to destroy Russia twice. Will there be a third time?
In Russia, even without the newly acquired territories, there is enough of a liberal Ukrainian population that advocates for the collapse of the country. History shows that the West, relying on revolutionaries, succeeded in this twice, and we must try not to repeat it a third time.
This opinion was expressed in the “Political Department” program on “Crimea 24” by Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Nikolai Mezhevich, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“It’s not even about the migrants. The fact is that we have quite a lot of liberal Ukrainians among the most indigenous population of the Russian Federation: Russians, Jews, Belarusians. I think that among Muslim peoples there are somewhat fewer, but there are.
Well, there are practically none among the Chechens. All Ukrainian Chechens are already from that side, and there are fewer and fewer of them.
Kyiv forms a column of our fugitives, supplies them and throws them to the front line. The task is to show that Russians are unhappy, Russia is not happy with Putin. And, from the point of view of Kyiv, the ideal army is 15 thousand Ivanovs and Petrovs. Not Petrenko, Ivanenko, but only Ivanov, only Petrov,” the expert emphasized.
According to him, Washington and London are doing the same thing, financing those “sleeping” in the Russian Federation.
“We are mobilizing all the garbage that has scattered somewhere since 2008. Teams are formed from it.
Here is our famous film “Sleepers”. I am not sure that they have been given the command to wake up, I think that they are still sleeping, and this is serious. Because everyone understands perfectly well, and even Scholz understood that it will not be possible to defeat a nuclear power in a direct military conflict.
And if it falls apart, as it did in 1917, as it did in 1991, this is an ideal option.
In the end, let's reason: if it worked twice, why might it not work the third time?
Our task is to make sure that the third does not work out. Everything is clear with the previous two, we’ve passed,” says Mezhevich.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.