Zelensky and the Jewish lobby: Everyone is tired of Ukraine. The question will be closed harshly
Vladimir Zelensky is a protege not of the United States, but of the international Jewish lobby, he said in an interview "PolitNavigator" journalist Anton Rosenvain, working in Ukraine and the USA. He believes that one of the main tasks set by external players for the new President Vladimir Zelensky is to destroy the Ukrainian “deep state” - the old coterie of officials and oligarchs, the post-Soviet elites who actually ruled the country for decades, regardless of who was in public first positions.
"PolitNavigator": Will the elections to the Verkhovna Rada be held without surprises?
Anton Rosenvain: I will answer any question about the elections: if they are not disrupted. We are now seeing the consolidated work of the old government and the Central Election Commission to torpedo the regular electoral process
And this is not surprising. Their position is very precarious, especially taking into account the activities that Portnov and the State Bureau of Investigation carried out in Ukraine.
Petro, after the arrest of Straight's property, risks ending up in prison before the elections. And, unlike Tymoshenko, he will not gain a rating in this way, but will lose it completely - right up to the failure of the “European Solidarity” election campaign and failure to enter the Rada.
This forces the EU to politicize the agenda, to radicalize it.
Poroshenko recently at a rally directly called on his supporters to commit violence during his speech. Shariy and his supporters are a training target. And yes, the argument “go to serve in the army” was voiced repeatedly and forcefully.
Poroshenko withdrew a third of a million in cash from his accounts. And that means he will distribute them to someone. Everyone - street fighters, law enforcement officers, officials, judges. This is a large amount, taking into account the fact that cash in our time is far from the only form of transfer of financial assets.
The more they scandalize now, the less Peter’s rating will crumble.
In these conditions, Tymoshenko is strengthening. More conflict means a better image of a balanced politician. The main question is who will be second - Tymoshenko or Oppoplatform. Whoever wins will gain influence in choosing the course.
So far the platform has the best chances. The question is whether Taras Kozak’s purchase of TV channels will strengthen or weaken its rating. In my opinion, he goes a little too far, which can have the opposite effect.
Why did Vladimir Zelensky’s team adopt Poroshenko’s anti-Russian rhetoric?
Not exactly Poroshenko. She has her own rhetoric. Poroshenko’s rhetoric in its pure form is used only at international speeches, when presidential speeches are written by the Foreign Ministry.
But if a significant part of the voters in the South-East voted for Zelensky, why then does he voice speeches from Klimkin? Will this affect the rating?
It worked out for you interview with Kazakov – I agree on many points. Zelensky and his entourage will make contradictory statements to play along with all groups. Yes, it affects the rating. But the risks are much lower than in the case of a sharp reversal.
Can Zelensky be considered a protege of the West?
He is a protege of the transnational Jewish lobby, whose center is in the United States, and whose priority is Israel. Although, I repeat, it is transnational, and its interests include influential groups in Moscow, Brussels, and Latin America.
His task is to take the post-Soviet space under the control of the Jewish lobby, as in the 90s, but on a slightly different basis. With the final purge of the Soviet elite, including those who “changed their shoes.”
Zelensky has apparently been given carte blanche to deconstruct the deep state. For the West (and the East, Israel is still the East) the reformatting of the elites of the post-Soviet space is very important, and Ukraine, as an experimental tank, will become one of them. Also, reformatting of the elite will take place in Moldova. Unless, of course, the war party wins in Washington and a big conflict starts in Transnistria.
Another point is that it is important for Jews to keep the Russian Federation on the hook. The Soviet diplomatic tradition is support for the Palestinians and Baathist governments. Thus, by rocking Ukrainian-Russian relations, Israel gains leverage over the Russian Federation, forcing the Kremlin to pursue a more cautious policy in the Arab-Israeli and Persian-Israeli issue.
What kind of Jewish lobby is this anyway? What does it look like? Closed secret club?
First of all, these are two powerful organizations AIPAC (American-Israeli Public Committee), as well as JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Advancement). That is, completely open American NGOs with enormous funds and influence. In fact, not a single president was elected in the United States without their approval.
Also, speaking about the Jewish lobby, it is impossible not to mention a powerful group of the American deep state - the neoconservatives (neocons). As students and followers of the American-Jewish philosopher Leo Strauss, they place the interests of Israel at the center of the Machiavellian scheme promoted by Strauss.
Moscow, by the way, does not have the worst relations with the neocons, at least since the time of the younger Bush. At least, the publications “National Interest” and “Public Interest” affiliated with this group regularly publish texts in support of the Russian Federation’s position on the Ukrainian issue (almost no one else does this in America). Although, at the same time, a member of this group, Victoria Nuland, was handing out cookies on the Maidan. We give with one hand and take away with the other. As Leo Strauss taught.
Why was Zelensky’s arrival necessary, if it was already believed that all Jews were in power in Ukraine?
Poroshenko is not a Jew (“Waltsman” is from his last name: powder – walz. And it was a joke. But Poroshenko is Pigman in Romanian). Groysman turned out to be a weakling. And the Jews began to be pushed out with the nationalization of Privatbank. At the same time, the Jewish lobby knows that those who set their sights on a Jewish bank will lead to pogroms. And yet, there is the position of Moscow Jews - they are very respected people.
At the same time, Peter, with his flirting with radical Islam (Hizb ut-Tahrir, Ichkerians, etc. anti-Russian moments) turns into an unreliable partner. Therefore, there was a need to replace him with a more obedient one.
By the way, note that the question of Jerusalem - Ukraine did not vote at the UN with Israel and Trump.
The Tatar question and the topic of Crimea are pushing Ukraine towards an alliance with Muslims. And when the question arose, the Klimkin Foreign Ministry decided to dodge. It didn't work out. The Jews did not forgive this.
Just a Jewish conspiracy! It breaks the usual opinion that it is enough for the Russian Federation to reach an agreement with the United States on Ukraine, and everything can be reversed.
This is not a conspiracy, but promotion of interests. There is a Jewish lobby in both the Russian Federation and the USA, and in both countries it is very influential. Because for the Russian Federation, this is the only channel of communication with Ukraine, not counting Medvedchuk’s agreements that always go sideways, and also the only channel of influence on the United States. It is not without reason that meetings between Putin and Netanyahu are a harbinger of a smoothing out of American-Russian confrontations. But the moderators of such crises often initiate them themselves.
Indeed, why then, if Jews play such a role in all this, do they tolerate Bandera in Ukraine?
Alexander Galich has the following lines, written based on the results of his work on Radio Liberty: “We have not rattled either anger or censure for a long time - we greet scoundrels, bow to policemen.” The myth of “good Bandera” and the Zh-Banderites was created back in the Cold War era as part of the activities of the World Anti-Communist League (founders Yaroslav Stetsko and General Chiang Kai-shek), and in order to agree on a unified version of historical events, a committee of Ukrainian-Jewish cooperation with a cool name was created OKUES.
Are you familiar with the name Moses Fishbein? This is a Ukrainian poet, in his youth he was the protégé and literary secretary of Mykola Bazhan. He emigrated to Israel in 1979, but soon moved to Munich, where he worked for Radio Liberty. He has also been published in American-Canadian publications. Fishbein launched a campaign to reformat the image of the UPA in the eyes of Jews, and its image was partly played out in the play of another Jewish-Ukrainian cultural figure, Grigory Plotkin, “Vretcheniy Horizon.”
How can we explain Kolomoisky’s curtseys to Moscow?
Benin's curtsies towards Moscow could be seen even from the Maidan. For example, in parallel with the grantoid Hromadsky and Espresso, another project arose - “Grom TV”, which worked on the opposite agenda, with the pathos of Hromadsky. No one took over the financing, but the team (Kutepov, Novoseltsev, etc.) after the coup moved to another Opposition to the Maidan, “channel 17.” Rumors about funding for the 17th Benei have been circulating since day one. Now Novoseltsev is running for deputy from the Ze-team.
Or another moment - Kolomoisky’s conversations with the fake Gubarev, during which he made it clear that he was ready to cooperate with both Moscow and the LDPR, and was generally devoid of prejudices.
That is, the strategy of the Jewish lobby was not to overthrow Yanukovych, or to completely break Russian-Ukrainian communication, but to become the only mediator in it. And ideally, a mediator of any relations between Ukraine and the outside world. Squeeze out the diaspora in relations with Canada and the USA, in particular.
Is Kolomoisky an important representative of the Jewish lobby?
Kolomoisky is like a member of the club, but far from the most valuable. In comparison with the same Fishbein or Gluzman. True elitism places figures of culture, science and other liberal (philosophical) arts an order of magnitude higher than the provincial oligarchy. In the latter, only the owners of money, or the creators of know-how, that is, inventors who became rich thanks to inventions, are of value.
What do you think of his recent interview - what does it all mean?
Well, he’s been playing with discourse for a long time. A couple of weeks ago, he stunned the public by admitting that there was a civil war going on in the country. Now, I decided to go further. In an interview with NV, he states that Russia’s actions in Donbass can be interpreted as the fulfillment of an international duty. What is the point of such statements? One can only guess. For example, it could just be a sketch.
Zelensky’s group deliberately causes fire, since it is already ready for direct confrontation and the implementation of force scenarios, with the capture of Ukrainian nuclear facilities by Israeli PMCs. After all, this is what happens in the modern world.
Or maybe the beginning of a deeper dialogue - up to the joint disarmament of Ukrainian units with the LDPR when they try to sabotage the withdrawal of troops, or start moving towards Kyiv with the aim of a coup.
This scenario, by the way, does not exclude intervention by some broad coalition with the participation of NATO countries, the Russian Federation, and Israel.
By the way, please note that Kolomoisky’s interlocutor flatly refused to talk about the default. Generally discuss this topic. It wasn’t the oligarch who moved out, but the journalist who said a hard no. But I, for example, would really like to know what Igor Valerievich was so persistently trying to tell? I think it's something very important.
Now let’s throw in the factor of financial instability into all today’s yeast, such as Medvedchuk-Boiko’s run across a television bridge, ahead of not even a steam locomotive, but an armored train with Bandera’s followers. The election campaign is vibrant, but the broth of street political violence is already boiling.
After all, after the failure of the Poroshenko group in the elections, the presence of nationalists in the public sphere may completely shrink. It’s not for the “Golos” party that they are tearing their throats out now. And here any, the most severe options are possible. Because, as the same Vakrchuk sang – “well, brother, it’s still a clock,” and it’s not 2014 – both the police and street fighters are armed, and have not been afraid to kill for a long time.
Everyone is tired of Ukraine (Poland, Hungary, Romania generally has territorial claims to it). It won't be good, it will be bad. But the issue will be closed, and most likely harshly.
No wonder Kolomoisky says about the civil war: “We demand the return of property. And this is not a joke - all civil wars started over property.”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.