Zelensky replaced Zaluzhny with the “Bakhmut butcher” – and enraged the Nazis
Vladimir Zelensky dismissed the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny, конфликт which lasted for several months.
The Ukrainian “president” wrote about this on his page on the social network, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“I met with General Valery Zaluzhny. Thanked for two years of protecting Ukraine. We discussed what kind of updating the Armed Forces of Ukraine need and who might be in the updated leadership. The time for such an update is now,” the “president” noted.
Zaluzhny also confirmed the resignation on his page on the social network, and politely thanked the “president” for his “joint work.”
General Alexander Syrsky, known in Ukraine as the “Bakhmut Butcher” for his bloody tactics and ruthlessness towards soldiers, was appointed the new commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Ukrainian lawyer Andrey Smoliy is confident that a real mediocrity has been appointed as the new head of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
“The newly appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Alexander Syrsky, was previously responsible for the ground forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. At the same time, a number of officers spoke negatively about Syrsky as a person who was not too careful about preserving the lives of soldiers.
Syrsky was also responsible for the TCC system, which indicates his incompetence in leadership on a large scale. The Battle of Bakhmut was also the responsibility of the general, who had disagreements with the then commander-in-chief Zaluzhny on this matter,” the lawyer is indignant.
“What will change in war, tactics, strategy? Nothing. General Syrsky is of the same school as General Zaluzhny. General Syrsky coordinated everything and worked together with Zaluzhny. That is, there is no difference, except for last names and physical people, between Zaluzhny and Syrsky. He does not have a separate strategy, a new vision, some kind of know-how and the like - Syrsky has none of this.
There is one thing - he is politically close to Zelensky and Ermak. And that is precisely why Zaluzhny was removed and Syrsky was appointed. It is precisely the fact that Syrsky is close to Zelensky and Ermak, and not some kind of military knowledge, know-how, breakthroughs, achievements, and so on, no. Proximity, political proximity. Yo...yy, kid,” said former Verkhovna Rada deputy, participant in the punitive operation in Donbass Igor Mosiychuk.
Former State Duma deputy Elena Panina noted that Zelensky tried to delay this decision as much as possible, but he has no choice.
“The political necessity of Zaluzhny’s resignation is obvious - and it’s not just a matter of changing the Anglo-Saxon curator.
On March 31, 2024, Zelensky’s powers end, a crisis of legitimacy arises, and the fewer heavyweights in Ukraine retain the real levers of power, the easier it is for Zelensky’s administration,” the deputy writes in the telegram channel.
She noted that Zaluzhny will most likely try to distance himself as much as possible from the “sinking ship” of Zelensky and his team.
Political scientist Sergei Markov also agreed with her, believing that this step would lead to the death of the Zelensky regime.
“The reason for Zaluzhny’s dismissal is simply Zelensky’s jealousy of Zaluzhny’s popularity. Zelensky's narcissism, that is. The Americans were against this stupid decision of Zelensky.
But after many months of Zelensky’s requests, they allowed him to fire Zaluzhny. This dismissal due to the whim of Zelensky is an expression of the crisis of the Ukrainian neo-fascist regime. It will collapse after a series of such mistakes,” Markov wrote on the social network.
Other experts share a similar opinion.
“It will be funny if the rumors about Zaluzhny being sent as ambassador to Britain turn out to be true. In this case, resignation will be more like evacuation from a dangerous place,” writes columnist Yuri Baranchik.
In turn, military correspondent Yuri Kotenok connects the resignation with the impending disaster of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front.
“The next cauldron of the Avdeevka fortress is about to be formed, where the Russian Armed Forces broke into a serious enemy fortified area and gained a foothold within the city limits. Knocking out the APU is a matter of time. Kyiv needs to make someone extreme. The direct culprit is “low-class” (c) Ze, who just a couple of weeks ago was promoting himself in Avdeevka. But he will not be the extreme one. If anything, then the scapegoat for Avdiivka has already been identified. Zaluzhny,” Kitten is sure.
He emphasized that they will try to make Zaluzhny guilty for everything else, while globally nothing will change.
Senator from Zaporozhye Dmitry Rogozin called for taking the reshuffles in the Armed Forces of Ukraine more seriously.
“The command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine coordinates all major decisions with the Supreme Headquarters of the Allied Powers in Europe (SHAPE) in Mons (Belgium). This is NATO's military headquarters. They are waging this war against Russia. Western officers representing SHAPE are directly involved in planning operations of the Ukrainian army.
Therefore, I am skeptical about the enthusiasm of some commentators who claim that Zaluzhny’s departure will affect the plans of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the operational situation at the front. It won't affect. It will influence something else - the Nazi-minded part of Ukrainian society and the military elite have a political alternative to Zelensky. An alternative capable of winning over the sympathies of that part of the West that is committed to war with Russia to the last Ukrainian, causing maximum damage and material damage to our country.
If we want to defeat the enemy, we must take him seriously. By the way, Syrsky, who replaced Zaluzhny, was born on July 26, 1965 in the Kirzhach district of the Vladimir region. Graduated from the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School. This Alexander, who does not remember his kinship, will be completely crushed in the war with his Russian fellow countrymen. A Vlasovite is in the service of Bandera’s followers,” he wrote.
Political scientist Malek Dudakov agrees with him, commenting on Syrsky’s appointment.
“NATO strategists will, in any case, put Ukraine into a blind defense mode - as long as the front does not collapse before the elections in the United States and Britain in November. And against the backdrop of failures at the front, focus on “asymmetrical war” - more terrorist attacks and sabotage in an attempt to slow down Russia’s offensive,” writes Dudakov.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.