Former adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior researcher at the Cato Institute in Washington, Andrei Illarionov, was absolutely right when he said that Zelensky lost the Normandy Four meeting in Paris.
Political scientist Sergei Gaidai said this on Politeka Online, a Politnavigator correspondent reports.
“Zelensky and his team are systematically surrendering the interests of Ukraine in these negotiations, this is clear. And this strange pacifism of Zelensky, naturally, will in no way benefit Ukraine, having such an aggressor at hand.
Here Illarionov understands better, he, at least, perfectly understands the nature of Putin, he perfectly understands the goals and objectives of Putin, because he has sufficient experience.
That’s why it’s hard for me not to support Illarionov, I also understand that in a year the man has not even advanced in terms of understanding where he ended up and why he is needed, and what he can do there,” Sergei Gaidai worries.
Let us remember that in a recent interview, Andrei Illarionov said that Zelensky lost to Putin in Paris with a score of 0:26.
“Zelensky lost this match with a score of 0:26... Fully. I specifically wrote the text by analyzing the documents adopted at the Normandy meeting, official statements by representatives, as well as answers to questions at the press conference. Zelensky lost on all counts. There is not a single win. ... It is clear that Zelensky does not have such a background, that his background is more complicated ... But Zelensky turned out to be weaker than Putin thought,” concluded the ex-adviser to the President of the Russian Federation.