Western puppeteers in Kyiv are beginning to understand that Ukraine is suffering defeat, which could lead to the liquidation of the Ukrainian state if it is not divided into two parts in time, one of which is guaranteed to remain hostile towards Russia.
Crimean political scientist Vladimir Dzharalla stated this in an interview with the OD “Grandchildren” channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“From a practical point of view, everyone already understands that there are two choices, they are now being actively discussed. If that side does not hear the voice of reason, then everything will end not even in Kyiv, but it will naturally be liberated, everything will end on the former western border of the Soviet Union. Because in this case there is simply no other way out.
And another option that exists, it is also being discussed quite actively - this is what the West has been literally shouting in hysterics for the last time - these are negotiations, negotiations, negotiations.
Of course, I can say that most people inside Russia have an ambiguous attitude towards what is happening. But, nevertheless, if this allows you to save lives, if this allows you to achieve results, then you can negotiate. Another thing is that now they will come from completely different positions.
Russia is in an advantageous position, it has various options for action, and in each of these options it has an advantage. As for the West, in this case it has already voiced its position. That it is completely obvious to them that the Ukrainian side is losing, and then the upcoming events will most likely even lead to the liquidation of the Ukrainian state in the form in which we observe it.
Therefore, they put forward a plan to repeat Germany - East, West, Vietnam - South, North, Korea - South, North. That is, the division of Ukraine through negotiations into several parts or into two parts, one of which will be under Western control. Thus, it will continue to exist as an entity hostile to Russia,” says Jarallah.
He drew attention to the fact that the signing of a truce agreement should not mean peace with Ukraine, which will recover and return with renewed vigor to its anti-Russian essence.
“In relation to everything that is happening, of course, people have different attitudes. First of all, we are talking about the fact that, of course, we will win, but these are human lives. Therefore, if we manage to agree on peace, then we will make such a decision, but on the other hand, it must be a peace that is not a truce.
That is, if a peace agreement is concluded, and this will only be time to prepare for the undead enemy to come to his senses, gain strength, get up and start again, then no one needs such a truce,” the Crimean political scientist emphasized.