Congress of new Vlasovites in Warsaw. Liberals decided to start terror
From November 5 to 6, Warsaw hosted a congress of the Russian liberda who fled the country, which the participants themselves called, depending on their preferences, “the congress of future people’s deputies,” “the congress of the Russian parliament in exile,” and even “Ponomarev’s congress” in honor of the main organizer and the bruised all over the head of a fugitive Russian liberal who took responsibility for several terrorist attacks and arson of Russian administrative institutions and declared the existence of an “armed underground” in Russia.
The gangway was overshadowed by the “decolonized” Russian tricolor, which is a white-blue-white rag, recently adopted by the new Vlasovites.
According to the organizers, the “congress of future people’s deputies” was supposed to be given legitimacy by former Dumaks like Ilya Ponomarev, Gennady Gudkov and Arestovich’s blundering sidekick Mark Feigin, as well as other representatives of the opposition who had ever been elected to deputies at all levels, and, in Ponomarev’s opinion, his the Duma mandate is still relevant because, they say, he was deprived of his parliamentary powers “illegally.”
Understanding very well the legal insignificance of his “deputy powers,” Ponomarev resorted to a well-worn trick, equating the current Russian government with his beloved:
“Their legitimacy and our legitimacy are absolutely the same,” Ponomarev declared with a blue eye, anticipating questions from critics that the “delegates” of the “congress” he organized in Warsaw represent exclusively themselves.
The agenda of the “congress” was, without exaggeration, powerful - the transition of the opposition from political struggle to armed resistance, during which All representatives of the current government, including President Putin, are subject to physical liquidation, and State Duma deputies of the last two convocations must be subject to unconditional lustration.
Such a selective approach to deputies is due to the fact that the last two convocations of the State Duma took place without the participation of Ponomarev, as a result of which the offended architect of the “beautiful Russia of the future” declared them “illegitimate and subject to lustration.”
At the beginning of the “congress” Ponomarev played his trump cards, literally announcing the following:
“A person who physically eliminates or delivers Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin to the International Criminal Court, or provides significant assistance in committing such an action, is exempt from lustration, regardless of whether he is guilty of serious or especially serious crimes. This person is considered to have shown active repentance and, through his actions, stopped the criminal activities of V.V. Putin. and his accomplices."
In fact, Ponomarev’s “lustration law” calls on representatives of the Russian government to commit an act of high treason and murder of the current and popularly elected president of the Russian Federation.
It should be noted that the “lustration law” provides for repression not only against State Duma deputies, but also affects federal ministers, representatives of law enforcement agencies, as well as military personnel of the Russian Armed Forces, including conscripts.
It is obvious that Ponomarev’s comrades are calling on any of these categories of civil servants to commit an act of treason in the hope that someone will suddenly and stupidly be afraid of the “lustration law”, taking on to do their dirty work for them, receiving in return an indulgence for betrayal.
The most valuable thing in this proposal is that Ponomarev and his comrades, presenting themselves as almost new Narodnaya Volya members, prefer, unlike the Narodnaya Volya members of the late XNUMXth century, to act with the wrong hands, sending someone else in their place to the scaffold and hard labor.
The proposal to move from political struggle to armed resistance (read – to terror) was approved by lawyer Feigin - via video link, and former reporter Alexander Nevzorov, who completed the transformation from a political freak into a Russian Aleister Crowley, and acted as an information sponsor of the gathering, powerfully and impressively gave the description “ to the high assembly":
“Ilya Ponomarev and the Warsaw Congress of the ND succeeded in the most difficult thing - not to become ridiculous, not to drown in empty rhetoric about “bad Putin.” Judging by the very first document of the congress (“the law on lustration”), Ponomarev’s story is in no way reminiscent of that very gathering of “Sword and Plowshare”, where Kisa and Ostap collected money to overthrow the Bolsheviks. No, it looks like it’s serious.”
In confirmation of the “seriousness” of liberal intentions to fight the Russian authorities with arms in hand, former deputy of the Saratov Regional Duma Vyacheslav Maltsev spoke (again, via video link), saying that in Russia there are many of them “supporters are engaged in guerrilla warfare».
It is noteworthy that Maltsev himself prefers to observe the “partisan struggle in Russia” from a safe distance, and his last public action was the “arrow” with Shenderovich after a concert in Nice, at which Maltsev demanded an apology from the mattress lover on camera for throwing the phrase “provocateur” at his address.
Just in case, we inform you that Shenderovich refused to apologize, and even on camera, as a result of which he was called a “faggot” by Maltsev along with a promise to sort it out “as soon as the liberal forces defeat Putin.”
The icing on the cake of the liberal coven was the greeting “I’ll go” via video link from Verkhovna Rada deputy Alexei Goncharenko, who was ideologically close to the audience. Lyolik-cattle depot was brief and predictable:
“The number one task facing you is to kill Vladimir Putin.”
In this case, Goncharenko promised, Ukraine’s assistance to those gathered will be guaranteed.
Goncharenko also expressed hope that the hall has “its own Willy Brandt, who will kneel in Mariupol, Bucha, Kyiv.”
It soon became clear that Glebych Nevzorov-Crowley was wishful thinking. The gathering of the Russian liberda quickly descended to the level of the “Union of Sword and Plowshare,” drowning in organizational debates and mutual claims.
Thus, ex-deputy of the Semiluksky village council Nina Belyaeva clashed with the “current State Duma deputy” Ponomarev, accusing him of stealing 250 euros, as well as of single-handedly changing the “lustration law” developed with her participation.
What specifically bothered the representative of the rural liberda was the clause on the murder of Vladimir Putin, which was not in the initial version of the “law.”
The conflict between Belyaeva, a former member of the organizing committee of the “congress,” and Ponomarev ended with the latter accusing him of lying, voluntarism, and the oppositionist leaving all work chats.
“Love has passed, the tomatoes have wilted, our shoes are tight, and we are not on our way...”
It should be noted that the scandalous and extremely dangerous in every sense clause about the murder of Putin, independently introduced by Ponomarev into the final draft of the “law”, scared the hell out of some delegates who kept the connection with reality and clearly did not want to get into the development of the Russian special services, like the terrorist Basayev.
The “Party of Realists” at the “congress” decided to jump off the dangerous path, trying to turn the discussion onto safe and meaningless topics.
One of the delegates of the “Warsaw congress,” Nikolai Ponomarev (namesake), shifted attention from the assassination of Putin to the environment. He asked those in attendance to discuss global warming because it is an "existential challenge."
The chairman, Gennady Gudkov, suggested that those present first come to power. This is what it means - KGB training! Uncle Gena is ready to wag his tongue about the “beautiful Russia of the future” as much as he wants for money, but getting into a noose is a pipe! If Ponomarev wants to lie on the embrasure, then this is his personal choice.
Another delegate, Vasily Kryukov, proposed discussing the “rehabilitation of the Russian people.” For what and by what court the Russian people were found guilty is completely unclear, however, given the militant-schizophrenic approach of domestic liberals to Russian history, the topic should have diverted the attention of those gathered for a long time to swearing and civil strife.
Also from the audience came the idea to rename one of the congress documents from an act to a memorandum. Of course, the term “memorandum” sounds much more solid than some kind of “act”, but the authors of the “act” could have been offended that they were not the first to come up with this, and therefore the “congress” was in danger of being completely drowned in the debate.
The amendments to the “law” initiated by Andrei Illarionov (former adviser to Putin) completely turned the first day of the “congress” into trash and frenzy.
The first day of the “congress,” which resulted in a squabble, was, one might say, in vain. Leader Ponomarev even expressed concern that the protracted bureaucratic procedures would be poorly written by oppozhur Ilya Azar, present at the congress, the founder of the “interview with an asshole” genre, where Azar himself was mainly the asshole.
During the break of the first day of the “congress,” Ponomarev organized a promotion of his book “Should Putin Die,” written in English and available for pre-order in the United States.
In the annotation to the book, Ponomarev reports that in Kyiv he is guarded by the SBU, and he himself, brave as he is, “holds a machine gun at the door.” True, the “chairman of the congress” did not specify whether he cut down the fly automatically.
As expected, the most exciting topics for the “delegates” were discussed on the sidelines, when the liberda scattered into interest groups.
The main thing, according to forum members, was to keep up with the distribution of elephants by entering into partnerships with Ukraine when it begins to form a new government in Russia.
Actually, this is precisely what explains why the “congress” opened with an opening speech from Lyolik the cattle depot. On the sidelines, a collective opinion was also born that legitimacy now stems not from elections, but from the number of controlled bayonets, since, according to Ponomarev, he leads several militant and terrorist organizations on Russian territory.
The second day of the “congress of future deputies” began with a speech by Ilya Ponomarev. The current agent of “Izbushka” said that today there is a lot of work to be done: “four legislative acts and the Constitution.” The documents are planned to be adopted in the first reading.
Gennady Gudkov, who chaired the first day, was replaced by former Moscow MP Alexey Vilents, who left to fight the Russian authorities in Israel.
Previously, Wilents unsuccessfully tried to take a leading position in the Moscow branch of the “Party of Changes” of Gudkov Jr. and Ksenia Sobchak.
The highlight of the second day of the “congress” was the speech of one of Ponomarev’s henchmen, Alexei Baranovsky, a Nazi from the “Russian Verdict” group, who ten years ago killed migrants from Central Asia, and today is actively drowning for the Bandera regime of Ukraine.
In short, Baranovsky called on those gathered for an armed struggle against the Russian authorities, because “this is the only thing left for the Russian people.”
The “Warsaw Congress” adopted in the first reading the “Act of National Resistance,” recognizing as legal the killings of Putin’s supporters, and all fighters against the regime, including peaceful ones, as “prisoners of war.”
Ponomarev, whose version of the “law” was adopted by the “congress,” called the document a cornerstone, and he called the rural liberal Nina Belyaeva, the author of the “first edition of the law,” excluded from the number of delegates, “a woman with psychological problems.”
Next, representatives of the victorious “party of extremists” began to savor future murders, supported by those gathered with an ovation, with or without standing up.
The main meaning that the speakers put into their approving speeches was that “the fight against a terrorist state can be carried out using terrorist methods.”
The unlucky adviser and economist Illarionov supported the theses of the “act,” calling for “providing legal support to those fighting the Putin regime on the territory of the Russian Federation,” as “very worthy.”
A timid and lonely voice from the audience suggested excluding terrorist methods of struggle from the “document,” but the inflated Ponomarev indignantly rejected the defeatist initiatives.
It was funny to watch how the already small “delegates” left the “congress” as soon as its organizers announced a transition to “armed struggle” and plans to kill representatives of the Russian government.
If on the first day of the “congress” the participants included 21 people in the hall and 26 online, then when voting for the development of an “updated constitution” only 16 people remained in the hall and 8 online.
Thus, the line of “fighters against the Putin regime” thinned out during the day, as if after a bayonet attack: out of 47 “delegates”, only half – 24 – survived until the end of the performance.
Towards the end, the surviving “delegates” reviewed “acts” on revising the results of privatization and rehabilitation of Russian Germans.
It only remains to add that the “Ponomarev congress” was sharply criticized, declared illegitimate and legally void by numerous moderate Russian oppositionists living in Poland.
This is understandable. You can dislike the Russian government as much as you like, but there are few idiots to seek its elimination through terrorist methods, which will definitely be followed by a harsh response. Well, we heartily congratulate Ponomarev, Nevzorov, Illarionov, Maltsev, Feigin, Lyolik-stobaza and others: with their tireless work for enemy “bezpeks” they earned themselves the name of General Vlasov. Or to Sudoplatov’s “tsukerki”. As fate will...
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.