Why do we need to save the surviving Azov terrorists?
Ukrainian and Western media continue to synchronously promote the scandal surrounding the death of captured militants from Azovstal after the Himers hit the prison in Yelenovka in the Donbass.
The goal is to place the blame on Moscow and cover up the mass murder of its soldiers, who cooperated with Russian investigators and began to give testimony proving war crimes by the top in Kyiv. Russian hackers who studied the internal correspondence of Ukrainian security officials found out some details.
The blow to the colony in Yelenovka came a few days after the prisoners of war were moved to a new isolation block. The Ukrainian Armed Forces planned an attack on the colony, but expected a slightly different result. But we had to proceed from what happened.
Initially, the strike was supposed to hit an empty room in close proximity to those where the “Azovites” were kept. The weapon systems used make this possible. The shelling was carried out at night deliberately - so as not to cause damage to prisoners of war who were outside during the day by random fragments.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces had information about a specific premises on the territory in which there were no prisoners of war. Satellite images provided by NATO showed the location of a possible strike - just an empty barracks, as they thought.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces strike, at the request of the Main Intelligence Directorate, with a precise attack on an empty isolation block should have been a clear and unambiguous signal to the newly loosened prisoners of war – that their future life depends not only on Russians.
Kiev did not expect that, despite clear and categorical instructions, some Ukrainian military personnel cooperate too actively with Russian intelligence services and make revealing statements in the Russian media. The number of talkative people began to increase.
And such a single targeted strike on the colony in Elenovka, according to the GUR’s plan, was supposed to have a psychological stimulating effect on prisoners of war and force them to close their mouths.
This does not mean that the Armed Forces of Ukraine showed increased philanthropy and humanism in relation to their charges. They understood perfectly well that it was impossible to hide who exactly was firing and with what.
On the contrary, they wanted the prisoners of war to be informed that the strike was carried out precisely and accurately - precisely by the Ukrainian military. The Azov team should have understood the hint from the first salvo. Both the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Main Intelligence Directorate understood that in the event of a sacrifice of Azov residents, this would cause a wave of anger among the relatives of the victims and would be an additional incentive for the eloquence of prisoners of war in custody.
But, apparently, the existing channels of communication between prisoners and Ukraine are malfunctioning and are not working effectively. Information about the change of barracks did not reach the power steering in time. This is such a sad accident.
GUR officers For a long time they didn’t believe it themselvesthat the attack hit an occupied living quarters, resulting in the killing of 50 prisoners of war.
They had to decide which version to broadcast for the population of Ukraine, their curators, and to appoint the culprit of what happened. As a result, an extremely clumsy version was chosen that does not stand up to criticism. - “The Russians struck at Elenovka themselves.” And, for internal consumption, they decided to assign responsibility for the murder of their own to one of the SBU officers, who assured of the reliability of his data about the locations of prisoners of war in the colony.
By the way, Ukrainians discuss in correspondence that, taking into account previously reached agreements, even after such a strike, prisoners of war will not be able to be transferred to another place.
Perhaps we shouldn’t so carefully observe agreements with murderers who use these same agreements exclusively for their own personal, selfish, bloody purposes? Maybe it makes sense to take the “Azovites” further to the rear - after all, they have extremely valuable information.
Normal people will not mourn those who went to Bandera. But it’s a pity that the information was not received from primary sources. about the crimes of the Nazi regime and about the acts of the direct perpetrators.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.